2013Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Conclusions

Joan Costa‐Font, Scott L. Greer

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Health systems throughout Europe often allocate power and resources over health policy to local and regional levels of government. However, rather than a single model of decentralization, we find a heterogeneous array of models that reflect very different political, historical, and policy logics This book has tried to bring together theoretical and empirical questions about decentralization, examining the implications of various models. This includes whether the state structure is formally federal or unitary, and whether decentralization is down to local, provincial regional or state level. Similarly, decentralization will take different shapes depending on how the health system is funded, given that funding is the ultimate source of legitimacy of public services. This conclusion will use evidence from the book chapters to respond to the three questions articulated at the beginning: what is decentralization, why do countries adopt a decentralized allocation of authority, and what do its effects appear to be? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Health systems throughout Europe often allocate power and resources over health policy to local and regional levels of government. However, rather than a single model of decentralization, we find a heterogeneous array of models that reflect very different political, historical, and policy logics This book has tried to bring together theoretical and empirical questions about decentralization, examining the implications of various models. This includes whether the state structure is formally federal or unitary, and whether decentralization is down to local, provincial regional or state level. Similarly, decentralization will take different shapes depending on how the health system is funded, given that funding is the ultimate source of legitimacy of public services. This conclusion will use evidence from the book chapters to respond to the three questions articulated at the beginning: what is decentralization, why do countries adopt a decentralized allocation of authority, and what do its effects appear to be? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Health systems throughout Europe often allocate power and resources over health policy to local and regional levels of government. However, rather than a single model of decentralization, we find a heterogeneous array of models that reflect very different political, historical, and policy logics This book has tried to bring together theoretical and empirical questions about decentralization, examining the implications of various models. This includes whether the state structure is formally federal or unitary, and whether decentralization is down to local, provincial regional or state level. Similarly, decentralization will take different shapes depending on how the health system is funded, given that funding is the ultimate source of legitimacy of public services. This conclusion will use evidence from the book chapters to respond to the three questions articulated at the beginning: what is decentralization, why do countries adopt a decentralized allocation of authority, and what do its effects appear to be? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Decentralization, Unitary state, Legitimacy, State (computer science), Politics, Central government, Public administration, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conclusions — Research Paper | ScholarLens