Double‐Integrator Model
Marcio de Queiroz, Xiaoyu Cai, Matthew Feemster
Abstract
Marcio de Queiroz, Xiaoyu Cai, Matthew Feemster
Abstract
This chapter discusses the class of formation controllers in the context of a slightly more refined model, viz., the double-integrator model. The double-integrator model accounts for the agent acceleration by treating the agent as a point mass. Therefore, it can be considered a very simple dynamic model for omnidirectional robots. The chapter also discusses a complication in the stability analysis of the closed-loop system that arises from the double-integrator model. Specifically, the complication is related to the avoidance of flip ambiguities. Solving the target interception problem for the double-integrator model requires a more elaborate solution than the one presented in the chapter for the single-integrator model. Formation controllers based on the double-integrator model are not as prevalent as single-integrator-based ones, especially within the realm of inter-agent distance control. The chapter provides a discussion on results that explicitly or implicitly address the formation control problem.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter discusses the class of formation controllers in the context of a slightly more refined model, viz., the double-integrator model. The double-integrator model accounts for the agent acceleration by treating the agent as a point mass. Therefore, it can be considered a very simple dynamic model for omnidirectional robots. The chapter also discusses a complication in the stability analysis of the closed-loop system that arises from the double-integrator model. Specifically, the complication is related to the avoidance of flip ambiguities. Solving the target interception problem for the double-integrator model requires a more elaborate solution than the one presented in the chapter for the single-integrator model. Formation controllers based on the double-integrator model are not as prevalent as single-integrator-based ones, especially within the realm of inter-agent distance control. The chapter provides a discussion on results that explicitly or implicitly address the formation control problem.
Key concepts: Integrator, Double integrator, Control theory (sociology), Computer science, Context (archaeology), Stability (learning theory), Control engineering, Control (management)