2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

Double‐Integrator Model

Marcio de Queiroz, Xiaoyu Cai, Matthew Feemster

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the class of formation controllers in the context of a slightly more refined model, viz., the double-integrator model. The double-integrator model accounts for the agent acceleration by treating the agent as a point mass. Therefore, it can be considered a very simple dynamic model for omnidirectional robots. The chapter also discusses a complication in the stability analysis of the closed-loop system that arises from the double-integrator model. Specifically, the complication is related to the avoidance of flip ambiguities. Solving the target interception problem for the double-integrator model requires a more elaborate solution than the one presented in the chapter for the single-integrator model. Formation controllers based on the double-integrator model are not as prevalent as single-integrator-based ones, especially within the realm of inter-agent distance control. The chapter provides a discussion on results that explicitly or implicitly address the formation control problem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the class of formation controllers in the context of a slightly more refined model, viz., the double-integrator model. The double-integrator model accounts for the agent acceleration by treating the agent as a point mass. Therefore, it can be considered a very simple dynamic model for omnidirectional robots. The chapter also discusses a complication in the stability analysis of the closed-loop system that arises from the double-integrator model. Specifically, the complication is related to the avoidance of flip ambiguities. Solving the target interception problem for the double-integrator model requires a more elaborate solution than the one presented in the chapter for the single-integrator model. Formation controllers based on the double-integrator model are not as prevalent as single-integrator-based ones, especially within the realm of inter-agent distance control. The chapter provides a discussion on results that explicitly or implicitly address the formation control problem.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the class of formation controllers in the context of a slightly more refined model, viz., the double-integrator model. The double-integrator model accounts for the agent acceleration by treating the agent as a point mass. Therefore, it can be considered a very simple dynamic model for omnidirectional robots. The chapter also discusses a complication in the stability analysis of the closed-loop system that arises from the double-integrator model. Specifically, the complication is related to the avoidance of flip ambiguities. Solving the target interception problem for the double-integrator model requires a more elaborate solution than the one presented in the chapter for the single-integrator model. Formation controllers based on the double-integrator model are not as prevalent as single-integrator-based ones, especially within the realm of inter-agent distance control. The chapter provides a discussion on results that explicitly or implicitly address the formation control problem.

Key concepts: Integrator, Double integrator, Control theory (sociology), Computer science, Context (archaeology), Stability (learning theory), Control engineering, Control (management)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double‐Integrator Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens