1964•American Journal of BotanyRequires access

Genome Analysis of Agropyron Repens x Agropyron Cristatum Synthetic Hybrids

Douglas R. Dewey

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Hexaploid A. repens, 2n = 42, and diploid A. cristatum, 2n = 14, were hybridized and gave rise to two 28-chromosome reciprocal hybrids. Approximately 1% of hand-emasculated florets of both parent species produced viable hybrid seed following controlled pollination. Early embryo abortion prevented greater hybrid seed set on A. repens, whereas failure of fertilization appeared to be the major cause of poor hybrid seed set on A. cristatum. Reciprocal differences in hybrid vegetative and spike morphology were striking. The A. repens × A. cristatum hybrid was vigorous, highly rhizomatous, and bore abundant spikes whose morphology was intermediate between that of the parent species. A. cristatum × A. repens hybrids were weak, non-rhizomatous with frequently-malformed spikes. Mean chromosome associations of 0.10 I, 20.10 II, and 0.43 IV were observed in 134 metaphase-I cells of A. repens. Subsequent meiotic stages were regular except for occasional laggards and bridges at anaphase I and II. Metaphase-I chromosome associations averaged 0.07 I and 6.97 II in 124 A. cristatum cells. Chromosome pairing in the hybrids was highly variable and averaged 11.45 I, 7.58 II, 0.44 III, and 0.02 IV per cell in 187 cells interpreted. From 5 to 14 laggards appeared in every hybrid cell at anaphase I. Bridges were observed in approximately 25% of the anaphase-I cells. Similar irregularities were observed at anaphase II. Pollen viability was estimated as 3%, and the hybrids failed to set viable seed. On the basis of chromosome pairing in the species itself and in the hybrids, A. repens was designated as a segmental autoallohexaploid with a genome formula of the type A1A1A2A2BB. Although A. repens and A. cristatum chromosomes paired occasionally, the genomes of the 2 species were essentially non-homologous. Some of the interpretational difficulties of genome analysis were discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hexaploid A. repens, 2n = 42, and diploid A. cristatum, 2n = 14, were hybridized and gave rise to two 28-chromosome reciprocal hybrids. Approximately 1% of hand-emasculated florets of both parent species produced viable hybrid seed following controlled pollination. Early embryo abortion prevented greater hybrid seed set on A. repens, whereas failure of fertilization appeared to be the major cause of poor hybrid seed set on A. cristatum. Reciprocal differences in hybrid vegetative and spike morphology were striking. The A. repens × A. cristatum hybrid was vigorous, highly rhizomatous, and bore abundant spikes whose morphology was intermediate between that of the parent species. A. cristatum × A. repens hybrids were weak, non-rhizomatous with frequently-malformed spikes. Mean chromosome associations of 0.10 I, 20.10 II, and 0.43 IV were observed in 134 metaphase-I cells of A. repens. Subsequent meiotic stages were regular except for occasional laggards and bridges at anaphase I and II. Metaphase-I chromosome associations averaged 0.07 I and 6.97 II in 124 A. cristatum cells. Chromosome pairing in the hybrids was highly variable and averaged 11.45 I, 7.58 II, 0.44 III, and 0.02 IV per cell in 187 cells interpreted. From 5 to 14 laggards appeared in every hybrid cell at anaphase I. Bridges were observed in approximately 25% of the anaphase-I cells. Similar irregularities were observed at anaphase II. Pollen viability was estimated as 3%, and the hybrids failed to set viable seed. On the basis of chromosome pairing in the species itself and in the hybrids, A. repens was designated as a segmental autoallohexaploid with a genome formula of the type A1A1A2A2BB. Although A. repens and A. cristatum chromosomes paired occasionally, the genomes of the 2 species were essentially non-homologous. Some of the interpretational difficulties of genome analysis were discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hexaploid A. repens, 2n = 42, and diploid A. cristatum, 2n = 14, were hybridized and gave rise to two 28-chromosome reciprocal hybrids. Approximately 1% of hand-emasculated florets of both parent species produced viable hybrid seed following controlled pollination. Early embryo abortion prevented greater hybrid seed set on A. repens, whereas failure of fertilization appeared to be the major cause of poor hybrid seed set on A. cristatum. Reciprocal differences in hybrid vegetative and spike morphology were striking. The A. repens × A. cristatum hybrid was vigorous, highly rhizomatous, and bore abundant spikes whose morphology was intermediate between that of the parent species. A. cristatum × A. repens hybrids were weak, non-rhizomatous with frequently-malformed spikes. Mean chromosome associations of 0.10 I, 20.10 II, and 0.43 IV were observed in 134 metaphase-I cells of A. repens. Subsequent meiotic stages were regular except for occasional laggards and bridges at anaphase I and II. Metaphase-I chromosome associations averaged 0.07 I and 6.97 II in 124 A. cristatum cells. Chromosome pairing in the hybrids was highly variable and averaged 11.45 I, 7.58 II, 0.44 III, and 0.02 IV per cell in 187 cells interpreted. From 5 to 14 laggards appeared in every hybrid cell at anaphase I. Bridges were observed in approximately 25% of the anaphase-I cells. Similar irregularities were observed at anaphase II. Pollen viability was estimated as 3%, and the hybrids failed to set viable seed. On the basis of chromosome pairing in the species itself and in the hybrids, A. repens was designated as a segmental autoallohexaploid with a genome formula of the type A1A1A2A2BB. Although A. repens and A. cristatum chromosomes paired occasionally, the genomes of the 2 species were essentially non-homologous. Some of the interpretational difficulties of genome analysis were discussed.

Key concepts: Biology, Agropyron cristatum, Anaphase, Repens, Hybrid, Agropyron, Meiosis, Ploidy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Genome Analysis of Agropyron Repens x Agropyron Cristatum Synthetic Hybrids — Research Paper | ScholarLens