ADENOCARCINOMA DIAGNOSED AT ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION
Helen L. Steed, Josef Z. Scott
Abstract
Helen L. Steed, Josef Z. Scott
Abstract
In Brief Background Endometrial ablation is a surgical alternative to hysterectomy. Cases exist in the literature of endometrial adenocarcinoma found at endometrial ablation. If endometrial cancer is occultit might not be detected during ablation, especially if destructive techniques are used. Case A 41-year-old woman had a history of menorrhagia. A previous D&C showed benign proliferative endometrium. Investigations for menorrhagia found no abnormalities. The diagnosis was dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Endometrial ablation was done and the pathologic examination of the resected endometrium found focal, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Conclusion This case shows the importance of patient selection, evaluation, and surveillance after endometrial ablation. Resection of the endometrium is superior to destructive techniques because it provides tissue for pathologic evaluation. We recommend close postoperative surveillance in such cases. Although endometrial ablation is an effective treatment of dysfunctional bleeding, the possibility of occult adenocarcinoma must be considered.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In Brief Background Endometrial ablation is a surgical alternative to hysterectomy. Cases exist in the literature of endometrial adenocarcinoma found at endometrial ablation. If endometrial cancer is occultit might not be detected during ablation, especially if destructive techniques are used. Case A 41-year-old woman had a history of menorrhagia. A previous D&C showed benign proliferative endometrium. Investigations for menorrhagia found no abnormalities. The diagnosis was dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Endometrial ablation was done and the pathologic examination of the resected endometrium found focal, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Conclusion This case shows the importance of patient selection, evaluation, and surveillance after endometrial ablation. Resection of the endometrium is superior to destructive techniques because it provides tissue for pathologic evaluation. We recommend close postoperative surveillance in such cases. Although endometrial ablation is an effective treatment of dysfunctional bleeding, the possibility of occult adenocarcinoma must be considered.
Key concepts: Medicine, Dysfunctional uterine bleeding, Endometrium, Endometrial ablation, Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial cancer, Ablation, Hysterectomy