2004Unpublished venueRequires access

From VHDL register transfer level to SystemC transaction level modeling: a comparative case study

Ney Calazans, Edson Moreno, Fabiano Hessel, Vitor M. Da Rosa, Fernando Moraes, Everton Alceu Carara

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

Transaction level (TL) modeling is regarded today as the next step in the direction of complex integrated circuits and systems design entry. This means that as this modeling level definition evolves, automated synthesis tools will increasingly support it, allowing design capture to start at a higher abstraction level than today. This work presents a comparison of traditional register transfer level (RTL) modeling and transaction level modeling through the implementation of a simple processor case study. SystemC is a language that naturally supports hardware transaction level descriptions. The R8 processor was described in SystemC TL and RTL versions and these were compared to an equivalent hand-coded VHDL RTL description in some key points, such as simulation efficiency and implementation results. The experiments indicate that TL descriptions present a faster path to system validation and that it is possible to envisage the automation of the design flow from this level of abstraction without significant impact on the quality of the final implementation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transaction level (TL) modeling is regarded today as the next step in the direction of complex integrated circuits and systems design entry. This means that as this modeling level definition evolves, automated synthesis tools will increasingly support it, allowing design capture to start at a higher abstraction level than today. This work presents a comparison of traditional register transfer level (RTL) modeling and transaction level modeling through the implementation of a simple processor case study. SystemC is a language that naturally supports hardware transaction level descriptions. The R8 processor was described in SystemC TL and RTL versions and these were compared to an equivalent hand-coded VHDL RTL description in some key points, such as simulation efficiency and implementation results. The experiments indicate that TL descriptions present a faster path to system validation and that it is possible to envisage the automation of the design flow from this level of abstraction without significant impact on the quality of the final implementation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transaction level (TL) modeling is regarded today as the next step in the direction of complex integrated circuits and systems design entry. This means that as this modeling level definition evolves, automated synthesis tools will increasingly support it, allowing design capture to start at a higher abstraction level than today. This work presents a comparison of traditional register transfer level (RTL) modeling and transaction level modeling through the implementation of a simple processor case study. SystemC is a language that naturally supports hardware transaction level descriptions. The R8 processor was described in SystemC TL and RTL versions and these were compared to an equivalent hand-coded VHDL RTL description in some key points, such as simulation efficiency and implementation results. The experiments indicate that TL descriptions present a faster path to system validation and that it is possible to envisage the automation of the design flow from this level of abstraction without significant impact on the quality of the final implementation.

Key concepts: SystemC, Transaction-level modeling, Computer science, VHDL, Electronic system-level design and verification, High-level synthesis, Register-transfer level, Hardware description language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From VHDL register transfer level to SystemC transaction level modeling: a comparative case study — Research Paper | ScholarLens