1973The Japanese Journal of PharmacologyOpen access

A Simple Method for Evaluating Physical Dependence Liability in Rats

Seiichi Nurimoto

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The single dose suppression test was applied to estimating addiction liability of compounds in rats. Morphine at a dose of 50 mg/kg was chronically administered twice daily for more than 12 weeks, and the body wt. loss following morphine withdrawal was measured for 24 hr as a parameter of abstinence syndrome. A test compound was administered to the morphine withdrawn rats and physical dependence liability was determined from the increase in body wt. The results of narcotic analgesics in this method coincided well with those seen in monkeys, however, rats appeared to be particularly sensitive to morphine-like narcotics. Narcotic antagonists, nalorphine and pentazocine, produced a severe abstinence syndrome, and antipyretics, tranquilizers, hypnotics and antihistaminics had no influence on body wt. loss in the morphine addicted rats. Thus, the single dose suppression test in rats can be useful in detecting physical dependence liability of new compounds, especially morphine-like analgesics.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The single dose suppression test was applied to estimating addiction liability of compounds in rats. Morphine at a dose of 50 mg/kg was chronically administered twice daily for more than 12 weeks, and the body wt. loss following morphine withdrawal was measured for 24 hr as a parameter of abstinence syndrome. A test compound was administered to the morphine withdrawn rats and physical dependence liability was determined from the increase in body wt. The results of narcotic analgesics in this method coincided well with those seen in monkeys, however, rats appeared to be particularly sensitive to morphine-like narcotics. Narcotic antagonists, nalorphine and pentazocine, produced a severe abstinence syndrome, and antipyretics, tranquilizers, hypnotics and antihistaminics had no influence on body wt. loss in the morphine addicted rats. Thus, the single dose suppression test in rats can be useful in detecting physical dependence liability of new compounds, especially morphine-like analgesics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The single dose suppression test was applied to estimating addiction liability of compounds in rats. Morphine at a dose of 50 mg/kg was chronically administered twice daily for more than 12 weeks, and the body wt. loss following morphine withdrawal was measured for 24 hr as a parameter of abstinence syndrome. A test compound was administered to the morphine withdrawn rats and physical dependence liability was determined from the increase in body wt. The results of narcotic analgesics in this method coincided well with those seen in monkeys, however, rats appeared to be particularly sensitive to morphine-like narcotics. Narcotic antagonists, nalorphine and pentazocine, produced a severe abstinence syndrome, and antipyretics, tranquilizers, hypnotics and antihistaminics had no influence on body wt. loss in the morphine addicted rats. Thus, the single dose suppression test in rats can be useful in detecting physical dependence liability of new compounds, especially morphine-like analgesics.

Key concepts: Nalorphine, Physical dependence, Pentazocine, Morphine, Narcotic, Abstinence Syndrome, Anesthesia, Abstinence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Simple Method for Evaluating Physical Dependence Liability in Rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens