1959•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Listener Reaction to Stereophonic Reproduction by Reflected Sound

George W. Sioles, Richard W. Carlisle

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Comparisons were made by numerous observers of the stereophonic perception of direct versus reflected sound. For conventional direct sound, two loudspeakers having wide frequency response were used at spacings of from six to fifteen feet, directed toward the listeners. For reflected sound, equivalent dual sound sources were used placed back-to-back near the walls of a room in which it was desired to establish a stereo sound field. The frequency response of the latter system was equalized to have the same apparent response as the conventional system. Many of the tests were conducted behind a sound permeable screen. Listeners were mixed in their ability to identify the reflective systems and in their preference for one system over the other, although they reacted favorably to both systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparisons were made by numerous observers of the stereophonic perception of direct versus reflected sound. For conventional direct sound, two loudspeakers having wide frequency response were used at spacings of from six to fifteen feet, directed toward the listeners. For reflected sound, equivalent dual sound sources were used placed back-to-back near the walls of a room in which it was desired to establish a stereo sound field. The frequency response of the latter system was equalized to have the same apparent response as the conventional system. Many of the tests were conducted behind a sound permeable screen. Listeners were mixed in their ability to identify the reflective systems and in their preference for one system over the other, although they reacted favorably to both systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparisons were made by numerous observers of the stereophonic perception of direct versus reflected sound. For conventional direct sound, two loudspeakers having wide frequency response were used at spacings of from six to fifteen feet, directed toward the listeners. For reflected sound, equivalent dual sound sources were used placed back-to-back near the walls of a room in which it was desired to establish a stereo sound field. The frequency response of the latter system was equalized to have the same apparent response as the conventional system. Many of the tests were conducted behind a sound permeable screen. Listeners were mixed in their ability to identify the reflective systems and in their preference for one system over the other, although they reacted favorably to both systems.

Key concepts: Stereophonic sound, Loudspeaker, Acoustics, Sound (geography), Directional sound, Precedence effect, Computer science, Perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Listener Reaction to Stereophonic Reproduction by Reflected Sound — Research Paper | ScholarLens