Anatomical Distribution of Chronic Venous Insufficiency in a Chinese Population
Albert C.W. Ting, S. W. K. Cheng, L. L. H. Wu, Grace Cheung
Abstract
Albert C.W. Ting, S. W. K. Cheng, L. L. H. Wu, Grace Cheung
Abstract
Objective: To study the anatomical distribution of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in a Chinese population by means of duplex scanning. Procedures: A total of 582 limbs in 291 patients with primary venous insufficiency were classified clinically into three different groups according to SVS/ISCVS criteria and evaluated prospectively with duplex scanning. Results: One hundred and thirty-one limbs were classified into group I (CEAP clinical class 0), 291 into group II (CEAP clinical classes 1 and 2) and 160 into group III (CEAP clinical classes 3–6). Mixed deep and superficial venous incompetence was found in 70% and 83% of limbs in groups II and III, respectively. Reflux was also demonstrated in 73% of group I limbs. Conclusions: Most of our patients had mixed deep and superficial venous incompetence. The prevalence of deep venous incompetence in this population, in which deep vein thrombosis is rare, suggests a pattern of venous incompetence other than postphlebitic deep vein valvular dysfunction. The prevalence of reflux in the asymptomatic contralateral limbs implies a bilateral predisposition to venous reflux and thus a possible developmental origin of CVI.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To study the anatomical distribution of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in a Chinese population by means of duplex scanning. Procedures: A total of 582 limbs in 291 patients with primary venous insufficiency were classified clinically into three different groups according to SVS/ISCVS criteria and evaluated prospectively with duplex scanning. Results: One hundred and thirty-one limbs were classified into group I (CEAP clinical class 0), 291 into group II (CEAP clinical classes 1 and 2) and 160 into group III (CEAP clinical classes 3–6). Mixed deep and superficial venous incompetence was found in 70% and 83% of limbs in groups II and III, respectively. Reflux was also demonstrated in 73% of group I limbs. Conclusions: Most of our patients had mixed deep and superficial venous incompetence. The prevalence of deep venous incompetence in this population, in which deep vein thrombosis is rare, suggests a pattern of venous incompetence other than postphlebitic deep vein valvular dysfunction. The prevalence of reflux in the asymptomatic contralateral limbs implies a bilateral predisposition to venous reflux and thus a possible developmental origin of CVI.
Key concepts: Medicine, Chronic venous insufficiency, Duplex scanning, Asymptomatic, Reflux, Deep vein, Venous thrombosis, Population