ADHESIVE GLUE Vs SUBCUTICULAR SUTURING IN THYROIDECTOMY

BACKGROUND: Suturing has been the commonest method of surgical wound closure that is being practiced because of good results of skin closure. With adhesive glue being an alternative for skin closure which is less time consuming, comfortable, without the risk of needle prick injury and leaves behind a cosmetically acceptable scar. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare subcuticular suturing versus adhesive glue for skin closure in thyroidectomy with respect to clinical outcome which included postoperative pain, wound complications, wound dehiscence and cosmesis. MATERIALAND METHODS: This prospective study of 100 cases of skin closure using subcuticular suturing versus adhesive in thyroidectomy was carried out at BGS Global institute of medical science and Hospital, Bangalore with the aim of comparing suturing versus adhesive glue, with respect to clinical outcome which included postoperative pain, wound complications, wound dehiscence and cosmesis. RESULT: 100 patients divided into 2 groups, randomly underwent subcuticular suturing and adhesive glue skin closure. Post- operative pain was less in glue group (p value <0.001) and wound complications were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Octylcyanoacrylate provides an effective and reliable means of skin closure and yields similar cosmetic results as with subcuticular skin sutures. The incidences of wound complications are comparable in both the groups. However the severity of postoperative pain is lesser in the adhesive group.