1952Progress of Theoretical PhysicsOpen access

On Lagrangian Formalism

Kazuhiko Nishijima

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Key concepts: Rotation formalisms in three dimensions, Lagrangian, Formalism (music), Feynman diagram, Hamiltonian (control theory), Physics, Path integral formulation, Hamiltonian formalism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Lagrangian Formalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens