2018•European Heart JournalRequires access

P4190Incidence of infective endocarditis in patients considered at moderate risk

Lauge Østergaard, Nana Valeur, A W Wang, Henning Bundgaard, Mohsin Aslam, G G Gunnar Gislason, Christian Tobias Torp-Pedersen, Niels Eske Bruun, Lise Søndergaard, Lars Køber, Emil Loldrup Fosbøl

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Stratification of patients at risk of infective endocarditis (IE) remains a cornerstone in guidance of prophylactic strategies of IE. However, little attention has been given to patients considered at moderate risk. Purpose: To assess the comparable risk of IE among patients considered at moderate IE-risk, a background population, and a population at high-risk (prosthetic heart valve). Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we assessed patients with a diagnosis of aortic and mitral valve disorders, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), as well as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and compared these patient groups with 1) controls from the background population using risk-set matching and 2) a high-risk population (prosthetic heart valve). Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare risk of IE between risk groups. Results: We identified 94,996 patients with aortic or mitral valve disorder, 50,377 with a CIED, and 4,339 with HCM. The cumulative risk of IE after 10 years was 0.9% in valve disorder, 1.3% in CIED, and 0.5% in HCM-patients. Compared with the background population, valve disorder, CIED, and HCM carried a higher associated risk of IE, HR=12.26 (95% CI: 8.73–17.22), HR=11.21 (95% CI: 6.21–20.24), and HR=7.95 (95% CI: 3.36–18.81), respectively. All three study groups were associated with a lower risk of IE compared with high-risk patients, HR=0.33 (95% CI: 0.27–0.40) for valve disorder, HR=0.32 (95% CI: 0.26–0.40) for CIED, and HR=0.17 (95% CI: 0.09–0.33) for HCM.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Stratification of patients at risk of infective endocarditis (IE) remains a cornerstone in guidance of prophylactic strategies of IE. However, little attention has been given to patients considered at moderate risk. Purpose: To assess the comparable risk of IE among patients considered at moderate IE-risk, a background population, and a population at high-risk (prosthetic heart valve). Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we assessed patients with a diagnosis of aortic and mitral valve disorders, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), as well as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and compared these patient groups with 1) controls from the background population using risk-set matching and 2) a high-risk population (prosthetic heart valve). Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare risk of IE between risk groups. Results: We identified 94,996 patients with aortic or mitral valve disorder, 50,377 with a CIED, and 4,339 with HCM. The cumulative risk of IE after 10 years was 0.9% in valve disorder, 1.3% in CIED, and 0.5% in HCM-patients. Compared with the background population, valve disorder, CIED, and HCM carried a higher associated risk of IE, HR=12.26 (95% CI: 8.73–17.22), HR=11.21 (95% CI: 6.21–20.24), and HR=7.95 (95% CI: 3.36–18.81), respectively. All three study groups were associated with a lower risk of IE compared with high-risk patients, HR=0.33 (95% CI: 0.27–0.40) for valve disorder, HR=0.32 (95% CI: 0.26–0.40) for CIED, and HR=0.17 (95% CI: 0.09–0.33) for HCM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Stratification of patients at risk of infective endocarditis (IE) remains a cornerstone in guidance of prophylactic strategies of IE. However, little attention has been given to patients considered at moderate risk. Purpose: To assess the comparable risk of IE among patients considered at moderate IE-risk, a background population, and a population at high-risk (prosthetic heart valve). Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we assessed patients with a diagnosis of aortic and mitral valve disorders, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), as well as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and compared these patient groups with 1) controls from the background population using risk-set matching and 2) a high-risk population (prosthetic heart valve). Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare risk of IE between risk groups. Results: We identified 94,996 patients with aortic or mitral valve disorder, 50,377 with a CIED, and 4,339 with HCM. The cumulative risk of IE after 10 years was 0.9% in valve disorder, 1.3% in CIED, and 0.5% in HCM-patients. Compared with the background population, valve disorder, CIED, and HCM carried a higher associated risk of IE, HR=12.26 (95% CI: 8.73–17.22), HR=11.21 (95% CI: 6.21–20.24), and HR=7.95 (95% CI: 3.36–18.81), respectively. All three study groups were associated with a lower risk of IE compared with high-risk patients, HR=0.33 (95% CI: 0.27–0.40) for valve disorder, HR=0.32 (95% CI: 0.26–0.40) for CIED, and HR=0.17 (95% CI: 0.09–0.33) for HCM.

Key concepts: Medicine, Infective endocarditis, Endocarditis, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P4190Incidence of infective endocarditis in patients considered at moderate risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens