2017Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Foundationalism

Michael Bergmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it. But when correctly understood, its main tenets (most prominently the claim that there can be properly basic beliefs) are virtually undeniable. The best way to get at the heart of foundationalism is to focus not on Descartes but on Aristotle and his famous regress argument. The chapter’s first main section unpacks that foundationalist argument. Its second main section addresses some objections to foundationalism. The third main section considers how foundationalism bears on topics in the epistemology of theology—topics such as Reformed epistemology, natural theology, biblical criticism, and post-foundationalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it. But when correctly understood, its main tenets (most prominently the claim that there can be properly basic beliefs) are virtually undeniable. The best way to get at the heart of foundationalism is to focus not on Descartes but on Aristotle and his famous regress argument. The chapter’s first main section unpacks that foundationalist argument. Its second main section addresses some objections to foundationalism. The third main section considers how foundationalism bears on topics in the epistemology of theology—topics such as Reformed epistemology, natural theology, biblical criticism, and post-foundationalism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it. But when correctly understood, its main tenets (most prominently the claim that there can be properly basic beliefs) are virtually undeniable. The best way to get at the heart of foundationalism is to focus not on Descartes but on Aristotle and his famous regress argument. The chapter’s first main section unpacks that foundationalist argument. Its second main section addresses some objections to foundationalism. The third main section considers how foundationalism bears on topics in the epistemology of theology—topics such as Reformed epistemology, natural theology, biblical criticism, and post-foundationalism.

Key concepts: Foundationalism, Epistemology, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Criticism, Law, Political science, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Foundationalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens