1988Anesthesia & AnalgesiaRequires access

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine, a New Amide Local Anesthetic

Richard G. Arthur, Hal S. Feldman, Benjamín G. Covino

Open publisher page 79 citations

Abstract

ARTHUR GR, FELDMAN HS, COVINO BJ. Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesth Analg 1988;67:1053-8. The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 ± 0.52 μg/ml compared with 3.35 ± 0.16 μg/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t1/2β) of ropivacaine (25.9 ± 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 ± 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 ± 8.2 ml.min−1.kg−1 compared with 32.3 ± 4.8 ml.min−1.kg−1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t1/2β of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t1/2β values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered. The results of this pharmacokinetic study indicate that after IV infusion of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, concentrations of ropivacaine decrease more rapidly than bupivacaine during the elimination phase. This may result in a greater margin of safety for the new agent. However, after epidural administration, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two drugs were quite similar.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ARTHUR GR, FELDMAN HS, COVINO BJ. Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesth Analg 1988;67:1053-8. The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 ± 0.52 μg/ml compared with 3.35 ± 0.16 μg/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t1/2β) of ropivacaine (25.9 ± 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 ± 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 ± 8.2 ml.min−1.kg−1 compared with 32.3 ± 4.8 ml.min−1.kg−1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t1/2β of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t1/2β values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered. The results of this pharmacokinetic study indicate that after IV infusion of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, concentrations of ropivacaine decrease more rapidly than bupivacaine during the elimination phase. This may result in a greater margin of safety for the new agent. However, after epidural administration, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two drugs were quite similar.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 79 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ARTHUR GR, FELDMAN HS, COVINO BJ. Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesth Analg 1988;67:1053-8. The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 ± 0.52 μg/ml compared with 3.35 ± 0.16 μg/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t1/2β) of ropivacaine (25.9 ± 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 ± 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 ± 8.2 ml.min−1.kg−1 compared with 32.3 ± 4.8 ml.min−1.kg−1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t1/2β of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t1/2β values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered. The results of this pharmacokinetic study indicate that after IV infusion of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, concentrations of ropivacaine decrease more rapidly than bupivacaine during the elimination phase. This may result in a greater margin of safety for the new agent. However, after epidural administration, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two drugs were quite similar.

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, Medicine, Cmax, Local anesthetic, Pharmacokinetics, Anesthesia, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine, a New Amide Local Anesthetic — Research Paper | ScholarLens