Environmental bias in twin studies
Sandra W. Scarr
Abstract
Sandra W. Scarr
Abstract
This study examines the responses of mothers of twin girls about similarities and differences of their monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. After these measures had been completed and scored, the investigator obtained zygosity diagnoses of the twins made by extensive blood‐group analyses. Of the 61 pairs of twins, 11 were misclassified by their mothers. Despite these mothers’ erroneous beliefs about the zygosity of their twins, they described the twins as having similarities and differences appropriate to their true degree of genetic relatedness.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study examines the responses of mothers of twin girls about similarities and differences of their monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. After these measures had been completed and scored, the investigator obtained zygosity diagnoses of the twins made by extensive blood‐group analyses. Of the 61 pairs of twins, 11 were misclassified by their mothers. Despite these mothers’ erroneous beliefs about the zygosity of their twins, they described the twins as having similarities and differences appropriate to their true degree of genetic relatedness.
Key concepts: Zygosity, Dizygotic twins, Twin study, Monozygotic twin, Psychology, Dizygotic twin, Demography, Developmental psychology