1969American Journal of BotanyRequires access

Chromosome Pairing in Natural First and Advanced Generation Liatris Hybrids

Donald A. Levin

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Chromosome pairing was analyzed in natural F1 and advanced generation hybrids of crosses between Liatris aspera and L. spicata, and L. aspera and L. cylindracea. The status of the hybrids was determined on the basis of morphological and chromatographic criteria. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. spicata contained pairing irregularities in 30% of their PMC's as compared to 10% in the hybrid segregates. Notably, translocation figures appeared in 7% of the F1 PMC's as compared to 0.6% in the segregate PMC's. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. cylindracea contained irregularities in 19% of their PMC's as compared to 7% in the segregates. Translocation figures occurred in 6% of the F1 PMC's, but only in 0.7% of the segregate PMC's. The incidence of pairing and level of structural heterozygosity was far lower in the hybrid segregates than was anticipated on the basis of F1 pairing relationships. Thus it would appear that there is selection for structural homozygosity in the hybrid segregates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chromosome pairing was analyzed in natural F1 and advanced generation hybrids of crosses between Liatris aspera and L. spicata, and L. aspera and L. cylindracea. The status of the hybrids was determined on the basis of morphological and chromatographic criteria. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. spicata contained pairing irregularities in 30% of their PMC's as compared to 10% in the hybrid segregates. Notably, translocation figures appeared in 7% of the F1 PMC's as compared to 0.6% in the segregate PMC's. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. cylindracea contained irregularities in 19% of their PMC's as compared to 7% in the segregates. Translocation figures occurred in 6% of the F1 PMC's, but only in 0.7% of the segregate PMC's. The incidence of pairing and level of structural heterozygosity was far lower in the hybrid segregates than was anticipated on the basis of F1 pairing relationships. Thus it would appear that there is selection for structural homozygosity in the hybrid segregates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chromosome pairing was analyzed in natural F1 and advanced generation hybrids of crosses between Liatris aspera and L. spicata, and L. aspera and L. cylindracea. The status of the hybrids was determined on the basis of morphological and chromatographic criteria. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. spicata contained pairing irregularities in 30% of their PMC's as compared to 10% in the hybrid segregates. Notably, translocation figures appeared in 7% of the F1 PMC's as compared to 0.6% in the segregate PMC's. The F1 hybrids of L. aspera × L. cylindracea contained irregularities in 19% of their PMC's as compared to 7% in the segregates. Translocation figures occurred in 6% of the F1 PMC's, but only in 0.7% of the segregate PMC's. The incidence of pairing and level of structural heterozygosity was far lower in the hybrid segregates than was anticipated on the basis of F1 pairing relationships. Thus it would appear that there is selection for structural homozygosity in the hybrid segregates.

Key concepts: Hybrid, Pairing, Biology, Chromosome pairing, Loss of heterozygosity, Chromosomal translocation, Genetics, Chromosome

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chromosome Pairing in Natural First and Advanced Generation Liatris Hybrids — Research Paper | ScholarLens