2015•Oxford University Press eBooksOpen access

Untitled research work

Ewan McKendrick

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This commentary analyses Article 7.4.3 of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) concerning the certainty of harm. Under Art 7.4.3, compensation is due only for harm, including future harm, that is established with a reasonable degree of certainty. Compensation may be due for the loss of a chance in proportion to the probability of its occurrence. If the amount of damages cannot be established with a sufficient degree of certainty, the assessment is at the discretion of the court. There is a link between the requirement that the harm must be proved with sufficient certainty and the requirement that there be a causal link between the harm and the non-performance. The burden of proof is upon the aggrieved party to establish both the existence and the extent of the harm with a reasonable degree of certainty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This commentary analyses Article 7.4.3 of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) concerning the certainty of harm. Under Art 7.4.3, compensation is due only for harm, including future harm, that is established with a reasonable degree of certainty. Compensation may be due for the loss of a chance in proportion to the probability of its occurrence. If the amount of damages cannot be established with a sufficient degree of certainty, the assessment is at the discretion of the court. There is a link between the requirement that the harm must be proved with sufficient certainty and the requirement that there be a causal link between the harm and the non-performance. The burden of proof is upon the aggrieved party to establish both the existence and the extent of the harm with a reasonable degree of certainty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This commentary analyses Article 7.4.3 of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) concerning the certainty of harm. Under Art 7.4.3, compensation is due only for harm, including future harm, that is established with a reasonable degree of certainty. Compensation may be due for the loss of a chance in proportion to the probability of its occurrence. If the amount of damages cannot be established with a sufficient degree of certainty, the assessment is at the discretion of the court. There is a link between the requirement that the harm must be proved with sufficient certainty and the requirement that there be a causal link between the harm and the non-performance. The burden of proof is upon the aggrieved party to establish both the existence and the extent of the harm with a reasonable degree of certainty.

Key concepts: Certainty, Harm, Damages, Compensation (psychology), Discretion, Actuarial science, Legal certainty, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Untitled research work — Research Paper | ScholarLens