2004Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification

Earl Conee

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

This chapter seeks to reconcile foundationalism with coherentism, and internalism with externalism. The idea is that the main strengths of each are compatible, even synergistic. Though this is not emphasized in thechapter, the evidentialism that we defend incorporates those strengths.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter seeks to reconcile foundationalism with coherentism, and internalism with externalism. The idea is that the main strengths of each are compatible, even synergistic. Though this is not emphasized in thechapter, the evidentialism that we defend incorporates those strengths.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter seeks to reconcile foundationalism with coherentism, and internalism with externalism. The idea is that the main strengths of each are compatible, even synergistic. Though this is not emphasized in thechapter, the evidentialism that we defend incorporates those strengths.

Key concepts: Internalism and externalism, Coherentism, Foundationalism, Externalism, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification — Research Paper | ScholarLens