2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Netting

Jon Gregory

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Bilateral derivatives markets have historically developed netting methods whereby parties can offset what they owe to one another. Most netting in the bilateral over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market is supported by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements. Bilateral netting of OTC derivatives merely increases the recovery for OTC derivatives counterparties but reduces the recovery of other creditors. Netting has been critical for the growth of the OTC derivatives market and, without it, the current size and liquidity of OTC derivatives would not exist. Bilateral markets have used trade compression as a way to achieve multilateral netting. This has developed since OTC derivatives portfolios grow significantly through time but contain redundancies due to the nature of trading. When promoting central clearing, a key point made by policymakers and regulators is often that central counterparties (CCPs) facilitate multilateral netting, which can alleviate systemic risk by reducing exposures more than in bilateral markets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bilateral derivatives markets have historically developed netting methods whereby parties can offset what they owe to one another. Most netting in the bilateral over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market is supported by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements. Bilateral netting of OTC derivatives merely increases the recovery for OTC derivatives counterparties but reduces the recovery of other creditors. Netting has been critical for the growth of the OTC derivatives market and, without it, the current size and liquidity of OTC derivatives would not exist. Bilateral markets have used trade compression as a way to achieve multilateral netting. This has developed since OTC derivatives portfolios grow significantly through time but contain redundancies due to the nature of trading. When promoting central clearing, a key point made by policymakers and regulators is often that central counterparties (CCPs) facilitate multilateral netting, which can alleviate systemic risk by reducing exposures more than in bilateral markets.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bilateral derivatives markets have historically developed netting methods whereby parties can offset what they owe to one another. Most netting in the bilateral over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market is supported by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements. Bilateral netting of OTC derivatives merely increases the recovery for OTC derivatives counterparties but reduces the recovery of other creditors. Netting has been critical for the growth of the OTC derivatives market and, without it, the current size and liquidity of OTC derivatives would not exist. Bilateral markets have used trade compression as a way to achieve multilateral netting. This has developed since OTC derivatives portfolios grow significantly through time but contain redundancies due to the nature of trading. When promoting central clearing, a key point made by policymakers and regulators is often that central counterparties (CCPs) facilitate multilateral netting, which can alleviate systemic risk by reducing exposures more than in bilateral markets.

Key concepts: Netting, Derivatives market, Business, Market liquidity, Commerce, Monetary economics, Economics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Netting — Research Paper | ScholarLens