2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Introduction

Peter Coss

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 1 defines the term ‘aristocracy’. It functioned in a militarized society where property was accompanied by physical power, the decline of public institutions, the rise of seigniorial power, and the prominence of vertical social relations. Aristocracy denotes a way of life and a sense of social superiority. Aristocracy is an historian’s construct, and there is a tension between the terms ‘aristocracy’ and ‘nobility’, the latter being a term of medieval usage. In this work ‘aristocracy’ is deployed to include all levels of the secular elite, while the use of ‘nobility’ is reserved until its crystallization in the late twelfth century. The word ‘aristocracy’ can be modified to describe levels within the elite and qualified according to social level, function or lifestyle, time and place, or origins. One can speak, therefore, of an urban aristocracy as well as a rural one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Chapter 1 defines the term ‘aristocracy’. It functioned in a militarized society where property was accompanied by physical power, the decline of public institutions, the rise of seigniorial power, and the prominence of vertical social relations. Aristocracy denotes a way of life and a sense of social superiority. Aristocracy is an historian’s construct, and there is a tension between the terms ‘aristocracy’ and ‘nobility’, the latter being a term of medieval usage. In this work ‘aristocracy’ is deployed to include all levels of the secular elite, while the use of ‘nobility’ is reserved until its crystallization in the late twelfth century. The word ‘aristocracy’ can be modified to describe levels within the elite and qualified according to social level, function or lifestyle, time and place, or origins. One can speak, therefore, of an urban aristocracy as well as a rural one.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Chapter 1 defines the term ‘aristocracy’. It functioned in a militarized society where property was accompanied by physical power, the decline of public institutions, the rise of seigniorial power, and the prominence of vertical social relations. Aristocracy denotes a way of life and a sense of social superiority. Aristocracy is an historian’s construct, and there is a tension between the terms ‘aristocracy’ and ‘nobility’, the latter being a term of medieval usage. In this work ‘aristocracy’ is deployed to include all levels of the secular elite, while the use of ‘nobility’ is reserved until its crystallization in the late twelfth century. The word ‘aristocracy’ can be modified to describe levels within the elite and qualified according to social level, function or lifestyle, time and place, or origins. One can speak, therefore, of an urban aristocracy as well as a rural one.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Introduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens