2018Unpublished venueRequires access

SELF-ASCRIPTION AND OTHER ASCRIPTION

Various

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

W e have seen earlier, in Chapter I, that it is too transparent to argue that all cases o f self-ascription will be asymmetrical to other-ascriptions. This would be the case o f the too-lonely ‘I’. It is consequently a corollary to the position which holds there is something substantive to first-person asymmetry that it be limited to a sub-class o f self-ascriptions. Unless the game is to be up at once there must be at least something I have in common with others. Plurals are necessary. Hence it is held that only a sub-class o f self-ascriptions differs from material body ascriptions in a type-distinct way. The remainder o f the class o f self-ascriptions is part o f the larger class o f material body ascriptions. In this way it has been claimed there are Minds and Bodies, my body in a class with others; or there are P-properties, or Psychical properties, and M-properties, my Material properties in a class with others.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

W e have seen earlier, in Chapter I, that it is too transparent to argue that all cases o f self-ascription will be asymmetrical to other-ascriptions. This would be the case o f the too-lonely ‘I’. It is consequently a corollary to the position which holds there is something substantive to first-person asymmetry that it be limited to a sub-class o f self-ascriptions. Unless the game is to be up at once there must be at least something I have in common with others. Plurals are necessary. Hence it is held that only a sub-class o f self-ascriptions differs from material body ascriptions in a type-distinct way. The remainder o f the class o f self-ascriptions is part o f the larger class o f material body ascriptions. In this way it has been claimed there are Minds and Bodies, my body in a class with others; or there are P-properties, or Psychical properties, and M-properties, my Material properties in a class with others.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

W e have seen earlier, in Chapter I, that it is too transparent to argue that all cases o f self-ascription will be asymmetrical to other-ascriptions. This would be the case o f the too-lonely ‘I’. It is consequently a corollary to the position which holds there is something substantive to first-person asymmetry that it be limited to a sub-class o f self-ascriptions. Unless the game is to be up at once there must be at least something I have in common with others. Plurals are necessary. Hence it is held that only a sub-class o f self-ascriptions differs from material body ascriptions in a type-distinct way. The remainder o f the class o f self-ascriptions is part o f the larger class o f material body ascriptions. In this way it has been claimed there are Minds and Bodies, my body in a class with others; or there are P-properties, or Psychical properties, and M-properties, my Material properties in a class with others.

Key concepts: Ascription, Psychology, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SELF-ASCRIPTION AND OTHER ASCRIPTION — Research Paper | ScholarLens