2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Multivessel disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction and high-risk unstable angina: culprit versus non-culprit intervention

Francesco Saia, David Antoniucci

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes • The ‘vulnerable’ patient • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiogenic shock • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina non-ST elevation myocardial infarction • Conclusions The definition ‘acute coronary syndromes’ (ACS) includes three different clinical entities, i.e. ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), unstable angina (UA), and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which share a common underlying pathophysiological mechanism, i.e. atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion, with differing degrees of superimposed thrombosis and distal embolization, and enhanced vasoreactivity. Hence, ACS are most of the time triggered by a single ‘culprit’ lesion, although sometimes there are multiple lesions which could be equally responsible for the clinical event.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes • The ‘vulnerable’ patient • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiogenic shock • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina non-ST elevation myocardial infarction • Conclusions The definition ‘acute coronary syndromes’ (ACS) includes three different clinical entities, i.e. ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), unstable angina (UA), and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which share a common underlying pathophysiological mechanism, i.e. atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion, with differing degrees of superimposed thrombosis and distal embolization, and enhanced vasoreactivity. Hence, ACS are most of the time triggered by a single ‘culprit’ lesion, although sometimes there are multiple lesions which could be equally responsible for the clinical event.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes • The ‘vulnerable’ patient • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiogenic shock • Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina non-ST elevation myocardial infarction • Conclusions The definition ‘acute coronary syndromes’ (ACS) includes three different clinical entities, i.e. ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), unstable angina (UA), and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which share a common underlying pathophysiological mechanism, i.e. atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion, with differing degrees of superimposed thrombosis and distal embolization, and enhanced vasoreactivity. Hence, ACS are most of the time triggered by a single ‘culprit’ lesion, although sometimes there are multiple lesions which could be equally responsible for the clinical event.

Key concepts: Culprit, Medicine, Unstable angina, Myocardial infarction, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Disease, Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multivessel disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction and high-risk unstable angina: culprit versus non-culprit intervention — Research Paper | ScholarLens