2018MetrologiaRequires access

On-site comparison of Quantum Hall Effect resistance standards of METAS and the BIPM: Ongoing key comparison BIPM.EM-K12

P. Gournay, Benjamin Rolland, A. Mortara, B. Jeanneret

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

An on-site comparison of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) resistance standards of the Federal Institute of Metrology METAS (Switzerland) and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was made in December 2017. Measurements of a 100 Ω standard in terms of the conventional value of the von Klitzing constant, R K-90 , agreed to 5 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 23 × 10 −10 . Scaling from 100 Ω to 10 kΩ has also been addressed through the measurement of a 10000 Ω/100 Ω ratio. The measurements carried out agreed to 2 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 19 × 10 −10 . Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An on-site comparison of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) resistance standards of the Federal Institute of Metrology METAS (Switzerland) and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was made in December 2017. Measurements of a 100 Ω standard in terms of the conventional value of the von Klitzing constant, R K-90 , agreed to 5 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 23 × 10 −10 . Scaling from 100 Ω to 10 kΩ has also been addressed through the measurement of a 10000 Ω/100 Ω ratio. The measurements carried out agreed to 2 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 19 × 10 −10 . Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An on-site comparison of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) resistance standards of the Federal Institute of Metrology METAS (Switzerland) and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was made in December 2017. Measurements of a 100 Ω standard in terms of the conventional value of the von Klitzing constant, R K-90 , agreed to 5 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 23 × 10 −10 . Scaling from 100 Ω to 10 kΩ has also been addressed through the measurement of a 10000 Ω/100 Ω ratio. The measurements carried out agreed to 2 parts in 10 10 with a relative combined standard uncertainty u c = 19 × 10 −10 . Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key concepts: Mutual recognition, Standard uncertainty, Metrology, Mathematics, Statistics, Scaling, Physics, Measurement uncertainty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On-site comparison of Quantum Hall Effect resistance standards of METAS and the BIPM: Ongoing key comparison BIPM.EM-K12 — Research Paper | ScholarLens