2018The International Encyclopedia of AnthropologyRequires access

Common Property

James Acheson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To avoid confusion about common property, it is important to distinguish between common‐pool goods and the governance regimes that manage those goods (e.g., private property, government, local rules). Classic theory regards a “commons” as inefficient and subject to extreme overexploitation. Yet many common‐pool resources can be well managed at the local level, as many studies by anthropologists have shown. Generating management rules necessitates solving a collective‐action problem. Elinor Ostrom lists the conditions necessary for durable management rules to be developed for common‐pool resources. However, all governance structures can fail for a variety of reasons. Holding resources jointly—particularly in the case of ocean resources—may be an optimal and efficient solution. New developments in the study of common‐pool resources are mentioned.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To avoid confusion about common property, it is important to distinguish between common‐pool goods and the governance regimes that manage those goods (e.g., private property, government, local rules). Classic theory regards a “commons” as inefficient and subject to extreme overexploitation. Yet many common‐pool resources can be well managed at the local level, as many studies by anthropologists have shown. Generating management rules necessitates solving a collective‐action problem. Elinor Ostrom lists the conditions necessary for durable management rules to be developed for common‐pool resources. However, all governance structures can fail for a variety of reasons. Holding resources jointly—particularly in the case of ocean resources—may be an optimal and efficient solution. New developments in the study of common‐pool resources are mentioned.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To avoid confusion about common property, it is important to distinguish between common‐pool goods and the governance regimes that manage those goods (e.g., private property, government, local rules). Classic theory regards a “commons” as inefficient and subject to extreme overexploitation. Yet many common‐pool resources can be well managed at the local level, as many studies by anthropologists have shown. Generating management rules necessitates solving a collective‐action problem. Elinor Ostrom lists the conditions necessary for durable management rules to be developed for common‐pool resources. However, all governance structures can fail for a variety of reasons. Holding resources jointly—particularly in the case of ocean resources—may be an optimal and efficient solution. New developments in the study of common‐pool resources are mentioned.

Key concepts: Common-pool resource, Common property, Commons, Collective action, Common ownership, Overexploitation, Confusion, Variety (cybernetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Common Property — Research Paper | ScholarLens