1960American Journal of BotanyRequires access

The Comparative Morphology and Relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels

James E. Canright

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Canright, James E. (Indiana U., Bloomington.) The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels. Amer. Jour. Bot. 47(2): 145—155. Illus. 1960.–The morphology and vascular anatomy of the carpels of 49 species in 9 of the 10 genera of the Magnoliaceae are described. Assuming that the conduplicate carpel of Australasian species of Drimys (Winteraceae) represents the primitive condition, various carpellary modifications are indicated for the Magnoliaceae. These evolutionary spcializations from the basic type include: basal adnation, lateral concrescence, reduction in number of ovules, closure of the ventral suture, and localization of stigmatic areas. Among the examined species it was determined that carpels of the genera Elmerrillia and Manglietia retain the most primitive features, whereas those of the genus Liriodendron possess the most advanced. Comparisons are made with the gynoecia of related ranalean families, viz., Himantandraceae, Degeneriaceae and Annonaceae.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Canright, James E. (Indiana U., Bloomington.) The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels. Amer. Jour. Bot. 47(2): 145—155. Illus. 1960.–The morphology and vascular anatomy of the carpels of 49 species in 9 of the 10 genera of the Magnoliaceae are described. Assuming that the conduplicate carpel of Australasian species of Drimys (Winteraceae) represents the primitive condition, various carpellary modifications are indicated for the Magnoliaceae. These evolutionary spcializations from the basic type include: basal adnation, lateral concrescence, reduction in number of ovules, closure of the ventral suture, and localization of stigmatic areas. Among the examined species it was determined that carpels of the genera Elmerrillia and Manglietia retain the most primitive features, whereas those of the genus Liriodendron possess the most advanced. Comparisons are made with the gynoecia of related ranalean families, viz., Himantandraceae, Degeneriaceae and Annonaceae.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Canright, James E. (Indiana U., Bloomington.) The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels. Amer. Jour. Bot. 47(2): 145—155. Illus. 1960.–The morphology and vascular anatomy of the carpels of 49 species in 9 of the 10 genera of the Magnoliaceae are described. Assuming that the conduplicate carpel of Australasian species of Drimys (Winteraceae) represents the primitive condition, various carpellary modifications are indicated for the Magnoliaceae. These evolutionary spcializations from the basic type include: basal adnation, lateral concrescence, reduction in number of ovules, closure of the ventral suture, and localization of stigmatic areas. Among the examined species it was determined that carpels of the genera Elmerrillia and Manglietia retain the most primitive features, whereas those of the genus Liriodendron possess the most advanced. Comparisons are made with the gynoecia of related ranalean families, viz., Himantandraceae, Degeneriaceae and Annonaceae.

Key concepts: Magnoliaceae, Gynoecium, Biology, Botany, Ovule, Morphology (biology), Genus, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comparative Morphology and Relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels — Research Paper | ScholarLens