ScholarLens Back to search
2007•Journal of ZoologyOpen access

Influence of income and capital on reproduction in a viviparous snake: direct and indirect effects

Patrick T. Gregory

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

In Gregory (2006), the following error was published in the Results section on page 417: However, for litter mass, only amount eaten had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The text was incorrect and should have read: However, for litter mass, only initial mass had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The author would like to apologize for this error and any resulting confusion.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Gregory (2006), the following error was published in the Results section on page 417: However, for litter mass, only amount eaten had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The text was incorrect and should have read: However, for litter mass, only initial mass had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The author would like to apologize for this error and any resulting confusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Gregory (2006), the following error was published in the Results section on page 417: However, for litter mass, only amount eaten had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The text was incorrect and should have read: However, for litter mass, only initial mass had a significant positive effect (F1,12=9.51, P=0.01; amount eaten –F1,12=0.86, P=0.4). The author would like to apologize for this error and any resulting confusion.

Key concepts: Biology, Confusion, Litter, Reproduction, Animal science, Zoology, Ecology, Psychology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of income and capital on reproduction in a viviparous snake: direct and indirect effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens