2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Insurance

Kenneth S. Abraham

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter highlights insurance law. One of the central principles of the New Private Law is that legal doctrine should be taken seriously. In insurance law, a corollary of that principle would seem to be that legal doctrine should take insurance policy language seriously. Insurance law and insurance law scholarship are largely—though not always—consistent with both the principle and its corollary. A contrasting view is that insurance law doctrine is, or should be, a vehicle for covert judicial regulation of insurance, for the purpose of policyholder protection or in order to promote more risk-spreading generally. This view can be called the “regulatory” conception of insurance law. Insurance law is not only a combination of common law doctrines and federal and state legislative and administrative directives. Insurance law also consists heavily of judicial interpretations of standard-form insurance policy language that has persisted unchanged for so long that the interpretations have the same practical effect as common law doctrines. These interpretations are so heavily anchored to the language of standard-form insurance policies that they are the locus of most insurance coverage disputes. The chapter then looks at the insurance application process; the insurance contract formation and interpretation; the general principles regarding the risks insured; the coordination of insurance coverage; and the remedies for breach of an insurance contract.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter highlights insurance law. One of the central principles of the New Private Law is that legal doctrine should be taken seriously. In insurance law, a corollary of that principle would seem to be that legal doctrine should take insurance policy language seriously. Insurance law and insurance law scholarship are largely—though not always—consistent with both the principle and its corollary. A contrasting view is that insurance law doctrine is, or should be, a vehicle for covert judicial regulation of insurance, for the purpose of policyholder protection or in order to promote more risk-spreading generally. This view can be called the “regulatory” conception of insurance law. Insurance law is not only a combination of common law doctrines and federal and state legislative and administrative directives. Insurance law also consists heavily of judicial interpretations of standard-form insurance policy language that has persisted unchanged for so long that the interpretations have the same practical effect as common law doctrines. These interpretations are so heavily anchored to the language of standard-form insurance policies that they are the locus of most insurance coverage disputes. The chapter then looks at the insurance application process; the insurance contract formation and interpretation; the general principles regarding the risks insured; the coordination of insurance coverage; and the remedies for breach of an insurance contract.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter highlights insurance law. One of the central principles of the New Private Law is that legal doctrine should be taken seriously. In insurance law, a corollary of that principle would seem to be that legal doctrine should take insurance policy language seriously. Insurance law and insurance law scholarship are largely—though not always—consistent with both the principle and its corollary. A contrasting view is that insurance law doctrine is, or should be, a vehicle for covert judicial regulation of insurance, for the purpose of policyholder protection or in order to promote more risk-spreading generally. This view can be called the “regulatory” conception of insurance law. Insurance law is not only a combination of common law doctrines and federal and state legislative and administrative directives. Insurance law also consists heavily of judicial interpretations of standard-form insurance policy language that has persisted unchanged for so long that the interpretations have the same practical effect as common law doctrines. These interpretations are so heavily anchored to the language of standard-form insurance policies that they are the locus of most insurance coverage disputes. The chapter then looks at the insurance application process; the insurance contract formation and interpretation; the general principles regarding the risks insured; the coordination of insurance coverage; and the remedies for breach of an insurance contract.

Key concepts: Insurance law, Insurance policy, Casualty insurance, Law, Liability insurance, Business, General insurance, Private law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Insurance — Research Paper | ScholarLens