What you always wanted to know about agile methods but did not dare to ask
Frank Maurer, G. Melnik
Abstract
Frank Maurer, G. Melnik
Abstract
A fleet of emerging agile methods is both gaining popularity and generating lots of controversy. Real-world examples argue for (e.g. Highsmith and Cockburn, 2001) and against (e.g. Rakitin, 2001) agile methods. Several leading software engineering experts suggest that synthesizing the two, agile with traditional, may provide developers with a comprehensive spectrum of methods (e.g. Boehm, 2002 and 2004 and Humphrey, 2005). This high-level overview tutorial provides background to understand how agile teams are trying to solve modern software development issues.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A fleet of emerging agile methods is both gaining popularity and generating lots of controversy. Real-world examples argue for (e.g. Highsmith and Cockburn, 2001) and against (e.g. Rakitin, 2001) agile methods. Several leading software engineering experts suggest that synthesizing the two, agile with traditional, may provide developers with a comprehensive spectrum of methods (e.g. Boehm, 2002 and 2004 and Humphrey, 2005). This high-level overview tutorial provides background to understand how agile teams are trying to solve modern software development issues.
Key concepts: Agile software development, Popularity, Computer science, Agile Unified Process, Ask price, Agile usability engineering, Scrum, Software