Thinking Outside the RGS Box
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Proteins of regulator of the G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved domain, the RGS domain, that allows these proteins to serve as negative regulators of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) by stimulating G protein intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. Thus, RGS proteins serve as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Johnson et al. provide evidence that RGS16, which has an RGS domain and can serve as a GAP for Gαi, does not require the RGS domain to inhibit Gα 13 signaling. Instead, inhibition of Gα 13 required the N-terminal domain of RGS16, which blocked the interaction of Gα 13 with its downstream effector, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho (p115Rho-GEF). RGS16 also altered the localization of Gα 13 such that the G protein was partially redirected to lipid rafts. Thus, RGS proteins appear able to affect G protein signaling through multiple mechanisms that allow specific interactions of a single RGS protein with different Gα subunits. E. N. Johnson, T. M. Seasholtz, A. A. Waheed, B. Kreutz, N. Suzuki, T. Kozasa, T. L. Z. Jones, J. H. Brown, K. M. Druey, RGS16 inhibits signalling through the Gα 13 -Rho axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 , 1095-1103 (2003). [Online Journal]
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Proteins of regulator of the G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved domain, the RGS domain, that allows these proteins to serve as negative regulators of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) by stimulating G protein intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. Thus, RGS proteins serve as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Johnson et al. provide evidence that RGS16, which has an RGS domain and can serve as a GAP for Gαi, does not require the RGS domain to inhibit Gα 13 signaling. Instead, inhibition of Gα 13 required the N-terminal domain of RGS16, which blocked the interaction of Gα 13 with its downstream effector, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho (p115Rho-GEF). RGS16 also altered the localization of Gα 13 such that the G protein was partially redirected to lipid rafts. Thus, RGS proteins appear able to affect G protein signaling through multiple mechanisms that allow specific interactions of a single RGS protein with different Gα subunits. E. N. Johnson, T. M. Seasholtz, A. A. Waheed, B. Kreutz, N. Suzuki, T. Kozasa, T. L. Z. Jones, J. H. Brown, K. M. Druey, RGS16 inhibits signalling through the Gα 13 -Rho axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 , 1095-1103 (2003). [Online Journal]
Key concepts: GTPase-activating protein, Heterotrimeric G protein, Guanine nucleotide exchange factor, G protein, RGS2, Regulator of G protein signaling, GTPase, Cell biology