2003Science s STKERequires access

Thinking Outside the RGS Box

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Proteins of regulator of the G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved domain, the RGS domain, that allows these proteins to serve as negative regulators of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) by stimulating G protein intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. Thus, RGS proteins serve as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Johnson et al. provide evidence that RGS16, which has an RGS domain and can serve as a GAP for Gαi, does not require the RGS domain to inhibit Gα 13 signaling. Instead, inhibition of Gα 13 required the N-terminal domain of RGS16, which blocked the interaction of Gα 13 with its downstream effector, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho (p115Rho-GEF). RGS16 also altered the localization of Gα 13 such that the G protein was partially redirected to lipid rafts. Thus, RGS proteins appear able to affect G protein signaling through multiple mechanisms that allow specific interactions of a single RGS protein with different Gα subunits. E. N. Johnson, T. M. Seasholtz, A. A. Waheed, B. Kreutz, N. Suzuki, T. Kozasa, T. L. Z. Jones, J. H. Brown, K. M. Druey, RGS16 inhibits signalling through the Gα 13 -Rho axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 , 1095-1103 (2003). [Online Journal]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Proteins of regulator of the G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved domain, the RGS domain, that allows these proteins to serve as negative regulators of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) by stimulating G protein intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. Thus, RGS proteins serve as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Johnson et al. provide evidence that RGS16, which has an RGS domain and can serve as a GAP for Gαi, does not require the RGS domain to inhibit Gα 13 signaling. Instead, inhibition of Gα 13 required the N-terminal domain of RGS16, which blocked the interaction of Gα 13 with its downstream effector, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho (p115Rho-GEF). RGS16 also altered the localization of Gα 13 such that the G protein was partially redirected to lipid rafts. Thus, RGS proteins appear able to affect G protein signaling through multiple mechanisms that allow specific interactions of a single RGS protein with different Gα subunits. E. N. Johnson, T. M. Seasholtz, A. A. Waheed, B. Kreutz, N. Suzuki, T. Kozasa, T. L. Z. Jones, J. H. Brown, K. M. Druey, RGS16 inhibits signalling through the Gα 13 -Rho axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 , 1095-1103 (2003). [Online Journal]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Proteins of regulator of the G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved domain, the RGS domain, that allows these proteins to serve as negative regulators of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) by stimulating G protein intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. Thus, RGS proteins serve as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Johnson et al. provide evidence that RGS16, which has an RGS domain and can serve as a GAP for Gαi, does not require the RGS domain to inhibit Gα 13 signaling. Instead, inhibition of Gα 13 required the N-terminal domain of RGS16, which blocked the interaction of Gα 13 with its downstream effector, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho (p115Rho-GEF). RGS16 also altered the localization of Gα 13 such that the G protein was partially redirected to lipid rafts. Thus, RGS proteins appear able to affect G protein signaling through multiple mechanisms that allow specific interactions of a single RGS protein with different Gα subunits. E. N. Johnson, T. M. Seasholtz, A. A. Waheed, B. Kreutz, N. Suzuki, T. Kozasa, T. L. Z. Jones, J. H. Brown, K. M. Druey, RGS16 inhibits signalling through the Gα 13 -Rho axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 , 1095-1103 (2003). [Online Journal]

Key concepts: GTPase-activating protein, Heterotrimeric G protein, Guanine nucleotide exchange factor, G protein, RGS2, Regulator of G protein signaling, GTPase, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thinking Outside the RGS Box — Research Paper | ScholarLens