1995•Agricultural EconomicsRequires access

Farm‐level nonparametric analysis of cost‐minimization and profit‐maximization behavior

Allen M. Featherstone, Ghassan A. Moghnieh, Barry K. Goodwin

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates non‐parametrically the optimizing behavior of a sample of 289 Kansas farms under profit‐maximization and cost‐minimization hypotheses. The study uses both deterministic and stochastic non‐parametric tests. The deterministic results do not support strict adherence to either optimization hypothesis. The stochastic tests suggest that all 289 farms fail the profit‐maximization hypothesis, whereas 171 farms failed the cost‐minimization hypothesis. Allowing for non‐regressive technical change docs not alter the basic results; 276 farms violate the profit‐maximization hypothesis and 138 violate the cost‐minimization hypothesis. The evidence against cost‐minimization behavior seems to be far less substantial than that against profit‐maximization behavior.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This study investigates non‐parametrically the optimizing behavior of a sample of 289 Kansas farms under profit‐maximization and cost‐minimization hypotheses. The study uses both deterministic and stochastic non‐parametric tests. The deterministic results do not support strict adherence to either optimization hypothesis. The stochastic tests suggest that all 289 farms fail the profit‐maximization hypothesis, whereas 171 farms failed the cost‐minimization hypothesis. Allowing for non‐regressive technical change docs not alter the basic results; 276 farms violate the profit‐maximization hypothesis and 138 violate the cost‐minimization hypothesis. The evidence against cost‐minimization behavior seems to be far less substantial than that against profit‐maximization behavior.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This study investigates non‐parametrically the optimizing behavior of a sample of 289 Kansas farms under profit‐maximization and cost‐minimization hypotheses. The study uses both deterministic and stochastic non‐parametric tests. The deterministic results do not support strict adherence to either optimization hypothesis. The stochastic tests suggest that all 289 farms fail the profit‐maximization hypothesis, whereas 171 farms failed the cost‐minimization hypothesis. Allowing for non‐regressive technical change docs not alter the basic results; 276 farms violate the profit‐maximization hypothesis and 138 violate the cost‐minimization hypothesis. The evidence against cost‐minimization behavior seems to be far less substantial than that against profit‐maximization behavior.

Key concepts: Profit maximization, Maximization, Minification, Nonparametric statistics, Profit (economics), Economics, Econometrics, Parametric statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Farm‐level nonparametric analysis of cost‐minimization and profit‐maximization behavior — Research Paper | ScholarLens