2004•Journal of Clinical OncologyRequires access

Oxaliplatin (OXA) plus folinic acid (FA) and 5-fluorouracil (FU) i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan (IRI) plus FA and FU i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACC): Activity and toxicity results of the SICOG 0103 randomized trial

P. Comella, B. Massidda, G. Filippelli, F. De Vita, D. Natale, A. Farris, F. Buzzi, L. Maiorino, S. Tafuto, Sergio Mancarella

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

4143 Background: IRIFAFU regimen showed activity and toxicity similar to other IRI+FU based combinations in ACC (Comella et al, Ann Oncol 2002). Primary end-point of SICOG trial 0103 was to compare response rate (RR) of OXAFAFU with that of IRIFAFU in ACC. Methods: ACC patients (pts) with measurable disease randomly received: IRI 200 mg/m2 i.v. (90-min) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 850 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 1,050 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (OXAFAFU high dose [HD]); both regimens were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis on the first 145 treated pts, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m2, and FU to 850 mg/m2 (OXAFAFU low dose[LD]). Results: From January 2001 to June 2003, 274 (135 IRIFAFU, 71 OXAFAFUHD, 68 OXAFAFULD) pts were treated. Pre-treatment characteristics according to arms: PS=1–2: 54/38/26; adjuvant FAFU: 34/19/15; two or more disease sites: 63/40/31; liver mets: 99/56/52. WHO toxicity (% pts) according to arms: febrile neutropenia= 4/10/1.5; Grade 4 neutropenia=14/35/19; Grade 3 or more diarrhea=25/10/10. Sixty-day mortality rate=4.4/4.2/4.3. Lévi Grade 3 neuropathy occurred in 11%/3% of pts treated with OXAFAFUHD/OXAFAFULD. RR according to arms: IRIFAFU=31%, OXAFAFUHD=41%, OXAFAFULD=44%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, 166 (60%) pts showed progression, and 118 (43%) pts died: overall median progression-free and survival times were 7.7 and 17.3 months. Numbers of events are still few for comparative analysis. Conclusions: OXAFAFULD regimen produced a significantly greater RR (Fisher's test, p=0.0478), and a lower toxicity than IRIFAFU. Updated results on progression-free and overall survival according to arm of treatment will be presented at the time of the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

4143 Background: IRIFAFU regimen showed activity and toxicity similar to other IRI+FU based combinations in ACC (Comella et al, Ann Oncol 2002). Primary end-point of SICOG trial 0103 was to compare response rate (RR) of OXAFAFU with that of IRIFAFU in ACC. Methods: ACC patients (pts) with measurable disease randomly received: IRI 200 mg/m2 i.v. (90-min) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 850 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 1,050 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (OXAFAFU high dose [HD]); both regimens were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis on the first 145 treated pts, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m2, and FU to 850 mg/m2 (OXAFAFU low dose[LD]). Results: From January 2001 to June 2003, 274 (135 IRIFAFU, 71 OXAFAFUHD, 68 OXAFAFULD) pts were treated. Pre-treatment characteristics according to arms: PS=1–2: 54/38/26; adjuvant FAFU: 34/19/15; two or more disease sites: 63/40/31; liver mets: 99/56/52. WHO toxicity (% pts) according to arms: febrile neutropenia= 4/10/1.5; Grade 4 neutropenia=14/35/19; Grade 3 or more diarrhea=25/10/10. Sixty-day mortality rate=4.4/4.2/4.3. Lévi Grade 3 neuropathy occurred in 11%/3% of pts treated with OXAFAFUHD/OXAFAFULD. RR according to arms: IRIFAFU=31%, OXAFAFUHD=41%, OXAFAFULD=44%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, 166 (60%) pts showed progression, and 118 (43%) pts died: overall median progression-free and survival times were 7.7 and 17.3 months. Numbers of events are still few for comparative analysis. Conclusions: OXAFAFULD regimen produced a significantly greater RR (Fisher's test, p=0.0478), and a lower toxicity than IRIFAFU. Updated results on progression-free and overall survival according to arm of treatment will be presented at the time of the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

4143 Background: IRIFAFU regimen showed activity and toxicity similar to other IRI+FU based combinations in ACC (Comella et al, Ann Oncol 2002). Primary end-point of SICOG trial 0103 was to compare response rate (RR) of OXAFAFU with that of IRIFAFU in ACC. Methods: ACC patients (pts) with measurable disease randomly received: IRI 200 mg/m2 i.v. (90-min) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 850 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) on day 1, and l-FA 250 mg/m2 i.v. (2-hour) + FU 1,050 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) on day 2 (OXAFAFU high dose [HD]); both regimens were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis on the first 145 treated pts, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m2, and FU to 850 mg/m2 (OXAFAFU low dose[LD]). Results: From January 2001 to June 2003, 274 (135 IRIFAFU, 71 OXAFAFUHD, 68 OXAFAFULD) pts were treated. Pre-treatment characteristics according to arms: PS=1–2: 54/38/26; adjuvant FAFU: 34/19/15; two or more disease sites: 63/40/31; liver mets: 99/56/52. WHO toxicity (% pts) according to arms: febrile neutropenia= 4/10/1.5; Grade 4 neutropenia=14/35/19; Grade 3 or more diarrhea=25/10/10. Sixty-day mortality rate=4.4/4.2/4.3. Lévi Grade 3 neuropathy occurred in 11%/3% of pts treated with OXAFAFUHD/OXAFAFULD. RR according to arms: IRIFAFU=31%, OXAFAFUHD=41%, OXAFAFULD=44%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, 166 (60%) pts showed progression, and 118 (43%) pts died: overall median progression-free and survival times were 7.7 and 17.3 months. Numbers of events are still few for comparative analysis. Conclusions: OXAFAFULD regimen produced a significantly greater RR (Fisher's test, p=0.0478), and a lower toxicity than IRIFAFU. Updated results on progression-free and overall survival according to arm of treatment will be presented at the time of the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bolus (digestion), Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Irinotecan, Neutropenia, Regimen, Oxaliplatin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Oxaliplatin (OXA) plus folinic acid (FA) and 5-fluorouracil (FU) i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan (IRI) plus FA and FU i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACC): Activity and toxicity results of the SICOG 0103 randomized trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens