1981International Astronomical Union ColloquiumOpen access

Comments on the Effect of Adopting New Precession and Equinox Corrections

J. G. Williams, W. G. Melbourne

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The new astronomical constants being introduced for 1984 affect the derived values of UT1 and terrestrial longitudes differently for the space techniques than for the optical techniques. The new sidereal time equation has been defined to avoid a discontinuity in UT1 as obtained by the established techniques. However, this definition does introduce a discontinuity in both the terrestrial longitude system and the UT1 rate derived by the space techniques which have an inertial celestial reference frame rather than a stellar catalog frame. The use of consistent expressions for precession and Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time will not eliminate differences between the inertial and classical optical techniques. Only improvements in the accuracy of the precession constant and equinox offset and drift will bring about consistency. Improvements in the precession constant can be expected in the next few years. The inertial techniques will exhibit shifts in the derived UT1 rate and terrestrial longitude system with each change in the precession constant if Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time is referenced to the mean equinox of date, as is the present practice, but would be stable if the reference is a fixed equinox. The latter choice is recommended.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The new astronomical constants being introduced for 1984 affect the derived values of UT1 and terrestrial longitudes differently for the space techniques than for the optical techniques. The new sidereal time equation has been defined to avoid a discontinuity in UT1 as obtained by the established techniques. However, this definition does introduce a discontinuity in both the terrestrial longitude system and the UT1 rate derived by the space techniques which have an inertial celestial reference frame rather than a stellar catalog frame. The use of consistent expressions for precession and Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time will not eliminate differences between the inertial and classical optical techniques. Only improvements in the accuracy of the precession constant and equinox offset and drift will bring about consistency. Improvements in the precession constant can be expected in the next few years. The inertial techniques will exhibit shifts in the derived UT1 rate and terrestrial longitude system with each change in the precession constant if Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time is referenced to the mean equinox of date, as is the present practice, but would be stable if the reference is a fixed equinox. The latter choice is recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The new astronomical constants being introduced for 1984 affect the derived values of UT1 and terrestrial longitudes differently for the space techniques than for the optical techniques. The new sidereal time equation has been defined to avoid a discontinuity in UT1 as obtained by the established techniques. However, this definition does introduce a discontinuity in both the terrestrial longitude system and the UT1 rate derived by the space techniques which have an inertial celestial reference frame rather than a stellar catalog frame. The use of consistent expressions for precession and Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time will not eliminate differences between the inertial and classical optical techniques. Only improvements in the accuracy of the precession constant and equinox offset and drift will bring about consistency. Improvements in the precession constant can be expected in the next few years. The inertial techniques will exhibit shifts in the derived UT1 rate and terrestrial longitude system with each change in the precession constant if Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time is referenced to the mean equinox of date, as is the present practice, but would be stable if the reference is a fixed equinox. The latter choice is recommended.

Key concepts: Equinox, Sidereal time, Universal Time, Geodesy, Greenwich, Inertial frame of reference, Physics, Apsidal precession

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comments on the Effect of Adopting New Precession and Equinox Corrections — Research Paper | ScholarLens