2015ASM Press eBooksRequires access

Phage-encoded Serine Integrases and Other Large Serine Recombinases

Margaret C. M. Smith

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Conservative site-specific recombination systems are ubiquitous in bacteria, where they play important roles in the horizontal transfer of genetic information, genome stability, and the control of gene expression. The outcomes of site-specific recombination are DNA integration, DNA excision (sometimes referred to as resolution), and DNA inversion. The systems comprise a recombinase, the sequence specific DNA substrates, and any accessory factors that are required for control. There are two evolutionarily and mechanistically different families of site-specific recombinases, the tyrosine and serine recombinases (1). All types of recombination outcomes are mediated by recombinases from both families. In the serine recombinase family there is a clear division between the resolvase/invertases and the enzymes that mediate integration/excision. The resolvase/invertases are approximately 180 to 200 amino acid proteins and are increasingly referred to as the small serine recombinases. The (pro)phage-encoded serine integrases, the transposases, such as those from clostridial ICE elements, Tn4451 and Tn5397, and the recombinases from the staphylococcal cassette chromosomes (SCC) elements are between 400 and 700 amino acids and are collectively known as the large serine recombinases (LSRs) (2). The first LSRs to be studied in in vitro recombination systems were the integrases from the Streptomyces phage, ɸC31 (3) and mycobacteriophage Bxb1 (4). Understanding the mechanism of the LSRs, however, was greatly hindered by the lack of structural information. In a breakthrough paper, Rutherford et al. published the structure of the large C-terminal domain (CTD) of a serine integrase bound to one half site of one substrate (5). This work has led to a step change in our understanding of the mechanism of the serine integrases (6, 7).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conservative site-specific recombination systems are ubiquitous in bacteria, where they play important roles in the horizontal transfer of genetic information, genome stability, and the control of gene expression. The outcomes of site-specific recombination are DNA integration, DNA excision (sometimes referred to as resolution), and DNA inversion. The systems comprise a recombinase, the sequence specific DNA substrates, and any accessory factors that are required for control. There are two evolutionarily and mechanistically different families of site-specific recombinases, the tyrosine and serine recombinases (1). All types of recombination outcomes are mediated by recombinases from both families. In the serine recombinase family there is a clear division between the resolvase/invertases and the enzymes that mediate integration/excision. The resolvase/invertases are approximately 180 to 200 amino acid proteins and are increasingly referred to as the small serine recombinases. The (pro)phage-encoded serine integrases, the transposases, such as those from clostridial ICE elements, Tn4451 and Tn5397, and the recombinases from the staphylococcal cassette chromosomes (SCC) elements are between 400 and 700 amino acids and are collectively known as the large serine recombinases (LSRs) (2). The first LSRs to be studied in in vitro recombination systems were the integrases from the Streptomyces phage, ɸC31 (3) and mycobacteriophage Bxb1 (4). Understanding the mechanism of the LSRs, however, was greatly hindered by the lack of structural information. In a breakthrough paper, Rutherford et al. published the structure of the large C-terminal domain (CTD) of a serine integrase bound to one half site of one substrate (5). This work has led to a step change in our understanding of the mechanism of the serine integrases (6, 7).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conservative site-specific recombination systems are ubiquitous in bacteria, where they play important roles in the horizontal transfer of genetic information, genome stability, and the control of gene expression. The outcomes of site-specific recombination are DNA integration, DNA excision (sometimes referred to as resolution), and DNA inversion. The systems comprise a recombinase, the sequence specific DNA substrates, and any accessory factors that are required for control. There are two evolutionarily and mechanistically different families of site-specific recombinases, the tyrosine and serine recombinases (1). All types of recombination outcomes are mediated by recombinases from both families. In the serine recombinase family there is a clear division between the resolvase/invertases and the enzymes that mediate integration/excision. The resolvase/invertases are approximately 180 to 200 amino acid proteins and are increasingly referred to as the small serine recombinases. The (pro)phage-encoded serine integrases, the transposases, such as those from clostridial ICE elements, Tn4451 and Tn5397, and the recombinases from the staphylococcal cassette chromosomes (SCC) elements are between 400 and 700 amino acids and are collectively known as the large serine recombinases (LSRs) (2). The first LSRs to be studied in in vitro recombination systems were the integrases from the Streptomyces phage, ɸC31 (3) and mycobacteriophage Bxb1 (4). Understanding the mechanism of the LSRs, however, was greatly hindered by the lack of structural information. In a breakthrough paper, Rutherford et al. published the structure of the large C-terminal domain (CTD) of a serine integrase bound to one half site of one substrate (5). This work has led to a step change in our understanding of the mechanism of the serine integrases (6, 7).

Key concepts: Recombinase, Integrases, Site-specific recombination, Tn3 transposon, Integrase, Biology, Genetics, DNA

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phage-encoded Serine Integrases and Other Large Serine Recombinases — Research Paper | ScholarLens