Comparison of Intravenous Contrast Agents for CT Studies in Children
Mervyn D. Cohen, Elizabeth Herman, Dianne E. Herron, Susan J. White, Julian A. Smith
Abstract
Mervyn D. Cohen, Elizabeth Herman, Dianne E. Herron, Susan J. White, Julian A. Smith
Abstract
One hundred and eighty children undergoing CT examination were randomly allocated to receive meglumine diatrizoate, iohexol, or iopamidol as their i.v. contrast agent. Minor side effects were detected in 85% of children receiving meglumine diatrizoate, in 18% of those receiving iohexol, and in 36% of those receiving iopamidol. Because many of these minor side effects cause patient motion or delay scanning after contrast medium injection, they potentially degrade image quality. These findings are an indication for the use of low osmolarity contrast agents for i.v. use in pediatric CT imaging.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One hundred and eighty children undergoing CT examination were randomly allocated to receive meglumine diatrizoate, iohexol, or iopamidol as their i.v. contrast agent. Minor side effects were detected in 85% of children receiving meglumine diatrizoate, in 18% of those receiving iohexol, and in 36% of those receiving iopamidol. Because many of these minor side effects cause patient motion or delay scanning after contrast medium injection, they potentially degrade image quality. These findings are an indication for the use of low osmolarity contrast agents for i.v. use in pediatric CT imaging.
Key concepts: Iopamidol, Medicine, Iohexol, Diatrizoate Meglumine, Meglumine, Diatrizoate, Contrast medium, Contrast (vision)