Effect of different grazing pressures by lambs grazing Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata pastures during spring on: 2. Intake and growth
WA van Niekerk, A Hassen, NH Casey, RJ Coertze
Abstract
Open-access reader
WA van Niekerk, A Hassen, NH Casey, RJ Coertze
Abstract
Open-access reader
This study was undertaken to determine the influence of three grazing pressures [high (HGP), medium (MGP) and low (LGP), corresponding to 30, 50 and 75 g available DM/kg BW/day, respectively] on the performance of lambs grazing Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata pastures in spring. Feed intakes and average daily live weight gains (ADG in g/day) were determined for each group. In general intakes of both L. perenne and D. glomerata pastures were higher at the end of the study than at the onset. Grazing pressure had no effect on the intake of L. perenne, but on the D. glomerata pasture, HGP resulted in a decreased intake by the lambs compared to the LGP treatment. For both pasture species the ADG of the lambs were lower on the HGP compared to the MGP treatment, though intake and ADG of the lambs were higher when grazing L. perenne compared to D. glomerata. Keywords:Cocksfoot; diet selection; pasture availability; perennial rye grass; performance South African Journal of Animal Science Vol. 36 (5) 2006: pp.50-53
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study was undertaken to determine the influence of three grazing pressures [high (HGP), medium (MGP) and low (LGP), corresponding to 30, 50 and 75 g available DM/kg BW/day, respectively] on the performance of lambs grazing Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata pastures in spring. Feed intakes and average daily live weight gains (ADG in g/day) were determined for each group. In general intakes of both L. perenne and D. glomerata pastures were higher at the end of the study than at the onset. Grazing pressure had no effect on the intake of L. perenne, but on the D. glomerata pasture, HGP resulted in a decreased intake by the lambs compared to the LGP treatment. For both pasture species the ADG of the lambs were lower on the HGP compared to the MGP treatment, though intake and ADG of the lambs were higher when grazing L. perenne compared to D. glomerata. Keywords:Cocksfoot; diet selection; pasture availability; perennial rye grass; performance South African Journal of Animal Science Vol. 36 (5) 2006: pp.50-53
Key concepts: Dactylis glomerata, Lolium perenne, Grazing, Pasture, Perennial plant, Biology, Agronomy, Grazing pressure