2016Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Torture (1978)*

Henry Shue

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

It is often assumed that if killing during war can be justified, then torture that does not kill also can. But torture constitutes merciless assault upon someone utterly defenceless because an effort to ‘surrender’ by providing the information sought may always be ruled by the torturer to be insufficient. Torture has different purposes, and terroristic torture is distinguished from interrogational. The ticking bomb scenario (TBS) used to defend torture ignores the terroristic variety and wildly misleads concerning interrogational torture by incorporating multiple false assumptions: the torturers have the right person, the torture victim provides timely accurate information, only torture could obtain the information, and, most importantly, torture will be rare. Practical ethics depends on examining actual practices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is often assumed that if killing during war can be justified, then torture that does not kill also can. But torture constitutes merciless assault upon someone utterly defenceless because an effort to ‘surrender’ by providing the information sought may always be ruled by the torturer to be insufficient. Torture has different purposes, and terroristic torture is distinguished from interrogational. The ticking bomb scenario (TBS) used to defend torture ignores the terroristic variety and wildly misleads concerning interrogational torture by incorporating multiple false assumptions: the torturers have the right person, the torture victim provides timely accurate information, only torture could obtain the information, and, most importantly, torture will be rare. Practical ethics depends on examining actual practices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is often assumed that if killing during war can be justified, then torture that does not kill also can. But torture constitutes merciless assault upon someone utterly defenceless because an effort to ‘surrender’ by providing the information sought may always be ruled by the torturer to be insufficient. Torture has different purposes, and terroristic torture is distinguished from interrogational. The ticking bomb scenario (TBS) used to defend torture ignores the terroristic variety and wildly misleads concerning interrogational torture by incorporating multiple false assumptions: the torturers have the right person, the torture victim provides timely accurate information, only torture could obtain the information, and, most importantly, torture will be rare. Practical ethics depends on examining actual practices.

Key concepts: Torture, Surrender, Criminology, Law, Computer security, Political science, Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Torture (1978)* — Research Paper | ScholarLens