2013The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal JusticeRequires access

Embezzlement

Jeffrey S. Walden

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Similar to other crimes, embezzlement is a hotly contested offense that appears to have garnered great attention from the inception of Edwin Sutherland's analysis and further analyzed by Donald Cressey. The occurrence of embezzlement can vary greatly from the taking of money from a place of employment, to the more grand schemes orchestrated within the highest levels of society, and often referred to as collective embezzlement. As with other crimes, scholars have examined the offense through various theoretical lenses varying from the general strain theory (GST) to the integrated theory of crime. While criminologists agree that embezzlement is prevalent within society, there is little data to substantiate the true scope of embezzlement. Even within the FBI's Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and the National Incident‐Based Reporting Systems (NIBRS), an accurate portrayal of the scope of embezzlement within society is largely unknown.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Similar to other crimes, embezzlement is a hotly contested offense that appears to have garnered great attention from the inception of Edwin Sutherland's analysis and further analyzed by Donald Cressey. The occurrence of embezzlement can vary greatly from the taking of money from a place of employment, to the more grand schemes orchestrated within the highest levels of society, and often referred to as collective embezzlement. As with other crimes, scholars have examined the offense through various theoretical lenses varying from the general strain theory (GST) to the integrated theory of crime. While criminologists agree that embezzlement is prevalent within society, there is little data to substantiate the true scope of embezzlement. Even within the FBI's Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and the National Incident‐Based Reporting Systems (NIBRS), an accurate portrayal of the scope of embezzlement within society is largely unknown.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Similar to other crimes, embezzlement is a hotly contested offense that appears to have garnered great attention from the inception of Edwin Sutherland's analysis and further analyzed by Donald Cressey. The occurrence of embezzlement can vary greatly from the taking of money from a place of employment, to the more grand schemes orchestrated within the highest levels of society, and often referred to as collective embezzlement. As with other crimes, scholars have examined the offense through various theoretical lenses varying from the general strain theory (GST) to the integrated theory of crime. While criminologists agree that embezzlement is prevalent within society, there is little data to substantiate the true scope of embezzlement. Even within the FBI's Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and the National Incident‐Based Reporting Systems (NIBRS), an accurate portrayal of the scope of embezzlement within society is largely unknown.

Key concepts: Embezzlement, Scope (computer science), Criminology, Law, Political science, Sociology, Criminal law, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Embezzlement — Research Paper | ScholarLens