Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice
Fernando Lusa Bordin
Abstract
Fernando Lusa Bordin
Abstract
Abstract The present column covers procedural developments at the International Court of Justice for the period spanning from 1 July 2015 to 31 March 2017. Those developments involve the existence of a dispute as a condition for the Court’s jurisdiction; the interpretation of compromissory clauses; the interpretation of declarations made under Article 36(2) of the icj Statute (the “Optional Clause”); the principles of res judicata, ne bis in idem and exhaustion of treaty processes; the indispensable third parties doctrine; the admissibility of requests to enforce judgments of the Court; issues of admissibility arising from multilateral disputes; and allocation of costs under Article 64 of the Statute.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The present column covers procedural developments at the International Court of Justice for the period spanning from 1 July 2015 to 31 March 2017. Those developments involve the existence of a dispute as a condition for the Court’s jurisdiction; the interpretation of compromissory clauses; the interpretation of declarations made under Article 36(2) of the icj Statute (the “Optional Clause”); the principles of res judicata, ne bis in idem and exhaustion of treaty processes; the indispensable third parties doctrine; the admissibility of requests to enforce judgments of the Court; issues of admissibility arising from multilateral disputes; and allocation of costs under Article 64 of the Statute.
Key concepts: International court, Res judicata, Law, Jurisdiction, Political science, Public international law, Interpretation (philosophy), Statute