2021The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal JusticeRequires access

Measurement Validity

Brie Diamond

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Measurement validity evaluates the relationship between a concept and an empirical indicator of that concept. Validity as a predictor of corporate crime; however, the same measure would be a valid predictor of violent street crime. Validity assessment takes various forms depending upon the measure at hand and its intended purpose. Face validity, content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity evaluate the accuracy of a given measure in different ways. Content validity concerns itself with whether or not a given indicator captures the full range of the concept it is intended to measure. Criterion-related validity concerns how well a measure relates to some external criterion that measures the same concept or which the measure is intended to predict. Predictive validity is attained if a given measure predicts a future outcome that it is designed to forecast.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Measurement validity evaluates the relationship between a concept and an empirical indicator of that concept. Validity as a predictor of corporate crime; however, the same measure would be a valid predictor of violent street crime. Validity assessment takes various forms depending upon the measure at hand and its intended purpose. Face validity, content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity evaluate the accuracy of a given measure in different ways. Content validity concerns itself with whether or not a given indicator captures the full range of the concept it is intended to measure. Criterion-related validity concerns how well a measure relates to some external criterion that measures the same concept or which the measure is intended to predict. Predictive validity is attained if a given measure predicts a future outcome that it is designed to forecast.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Measurement validity evaluates the relationship between a concept and an empirical indicator of that concept. Validity as a predictor of corporate crime; however, the same measure would be a valid predictor of violent street crime. Validity assessment takes various forms depending upon the measure at hand and its intended purpose. Face validity, content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity evaluate the accuracy of a given measure in different ways. Content validity concerns itself with whether or not a given indicator captures the full range of the concept it is intended to measure. Criterion-related validity concerns how well a measure relates to some external criterion that measures the same concept or which the measure is intended to predict. Predictive validity is attained if a given measure predicts a future outcome that it is designed to forecast.

Key concepts: Criterion validity, Face validity, Measure (data warehouse), Construct validity, Predictive validity, Content validity, Incremental validity, External validity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement Validity — Research Paper | ScholarLens