Defining Fascism: The “Thick” Method
Marcel H. Van Herpen
Abstract
Marcel H. Van Herpen
Abstract
It is now time to turn to the second approach to analyze fascist systems: the ideal type. This heuristical device, developed by the sociologist Max Weber, consists of bringing together a maximum number of properties that can be found in fascist systems. When we have an ideal type it is possible to compare a given system—in our case, Putinism—with this ideal type. Emilio Gentile can be recognized for having identified a number of central elements that can be used for the construction of such an ideal type. I will partially follow Gentile’s approach1 distinguishing four dimensions: organizational cultural ideological institutional
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is now time to turn to the second approach to analyze fascist systems: the ideal type. This heuristical device, developed by the sociologist Max Weber, consists of bringing together a maximum number of properties that can be found in fascist systems. When we have an ideal type it is possible to compare a given system—in our case, Putinism—with this ideal type. Emilio Gentile can be recognized for having identified a number of central elements that can be used for the construction of such an ideal type. I will partially follow Gentile’s approach1 distinguishing four dimensions: organizational cultural ideological institutional
Key concepts: Ideal (ethics), Ideal type, Ideology, Type (biology), Sociology, Epistemology, Computer science, Philosophy