Subjective Socioeconomic Status Predicts Self-Rated Health Irrespective of Objective Family Socioeconomic Background
Patrick Präg
Abstract
Patrick Präg
Abstract
Aim: Subjective appraisals of socioeconomic status (SES) are robustly associated with health outcomes, even when controlling for objective SES. Is this because objective SES is not accounted for in a sufficiently exhaustive way?Methods: I pool eight waves of nationally representative survey data from Germany (German General Social Survey, 2004–18, N = 13,557) to assess the association between two separate subjective appraisals of SES (a ten-point scale and subjectively chosen social class membership) and poor self-rated health using logit and linear probability models. I account for an exhaustive range of objective SES variables, including respondents’ household incomes and social status as well as occupational status, social class, education of respondents, and of their partners, fathers, and mothers.Results: The association between subjective socioeconomic status and poor self-rated health remains stable even when accounting for a wide range of objective SES markers. This is true for both subjective SES measured on a ten-point scale and as a subjective class identification.Conclusions: Even when controlling for a large number of objective SES markers, subjective SES and self-rated health are linked, suggesting that subjective assessments of SES are meaningful measures of SES which form a distinct pathway to health.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim: Subjective appraisals of socioeconomic status (SES) are robustly associated with health outcomes, even when controlling for objective SES. Is this because objective SES is not accounted for in a sufficiently exhaustive way?Methods: I pool eight waves of nationally representative survey data from Germany (German General Social Survey, 2004–18, N = 13,557) to assess the association between two separate subjective appraisals of SES (a ten-point scale and subjectively chosen social class membership) and poor self-rated health using logit and linear probability models. I account for an exhaustive range of objective SES variables, including respondents’ household incomes and social status as well as occupational status, social class, education of respondents, and of their partners, fathers, and mothers.Results: The association between subjective socioeconomic status and poor self-rated health remains stable even when accounting for a wide range of objective SES markers. This is true for both subjective SES measured on a ten-point scale and as a subjective class identification.Conclusions: Even when controlling for a large number of objective SES markers, subjective SES and self-rated health are linked, suggesting that subjective assessments of SES are meaningful measures of SES which form a distinct pathway to health.
Key concepts: Socioeconomic status, Social class, Scale (ratio), Psychology, Social status, Logistic regression, Self-rated health, Association (psychology)