2012Proceedings of the Water Environment FederationRequires access

Behind the 740M: Building a Technical Consensus for Indianapolis Consent Decree Amendment No. 2

David H. Sherman, Christopher J Ranck, Mark Jacob, Steven O. Nielsen, Doug Reichlin, Bob Masbaum

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Behind the $740M: Building a Technical Consensus for Indianapolis Consent Decree Amendment No. 2The February 2011 Engineering News Record article “With a Modified Consent Decree, Indianapolis Is Cleaning Up” (ENR, 2011) provided a high-level summary of Amendment No. 2 to the Indianapolis Consent Decree (CD), which reduced estimated CSO program costs by $740 million. The CD modification has been celebrated by U.S. EPA as a “win-win” since it resulted in cost savings...Author(s)David ShermanChristopher J. RanckMark JacobSteve NielsenDoug ReichlinBob MasbaumSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Sep, 2012ISSN1938-6478DOI10.2175/193864712811725799Volume / Issue2012 / 15Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2012Word count367

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Behind the $740M: Building a Technical Consensus for Indianapolis Consent Decree Amendment No. 2The February 2011 Engineering News Record article “With a Modified Consent Decree, Indianapolis Is Cleaning Up” (ENR, 2011) provided a high-level summary of Amendment No. 2 to the Indianapolis Consent Decree (CD), which reduced estimated CSO program costs by $740 million. The CD modification has been celebrated by U.S. EPA as a “win-win” since it resulted in cost savings...Author(s)David ShermanChristopher J. RanckMark JacobSteve NielsenDoug ReichlinBob MasbaumSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Sep, 2012ISSN1938-6478DOI10.2175/193864712811725799Volume / Issue2012 / 15Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2012Word count367

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Behind the $740M: Building a Technical Consensus for Indianapolis Consent Decree Amendment No. 2The February 2011 Engineering News Record article “With a Modified Consent Decree, Indianapolis Is Cleaning Up” (ENR, 2011) provided a high-level summary of Amendment No. 2 to the Indianapolis Consent Decree (CD), which reduced estimated CSO program costs by $740 million. The CD modification has been celebrated by U.S. EPA as a “win-win” since it resulted in cost savings...Author(s)David ShermanChristopher J. RanckMark JacobSteve NielsenDoug ReichlinBob MasbaumSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Sep, 2012ISSN1938-6478DOI10.2175/193864712811725799Volume / Issue2012 / 15Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2012Word count367

Key concepts: Decree, Consent decree, Amendment, Law, Political science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behind the 740M: Building a Technical Consensus for Indianapolis Consent Decree Amendment No. 2 — Research Paper | ScholarLens