1981JAMARequires access

Physician recognition of the signs and symptoms of secondary syphilis

T. A. Chapel

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Thirty-four patients with secondary syphilis, seen in a public clinic for sexually transmitted diseases, had been examined previously by 36 community physicians. Secondary syphilis was the primary diagnosis by 14 (39.9%) of the 36 physicians and was included in the differential diagnosis by five others (13.9%). Twelve (33.3%) had not considered syphilis but did obtain a routine serological test that eventually led to the correct diagnosis. Five other physicians (13.9%) failed to include syphilis in the diagnosis and did not order serological tests. (JAMA1981;246:250-251)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thirty-four patients with secondary syphilis, seen in a public clinic for sexually transmitted diseases, had been examined previously by 36 community physicians. Secondary syphilis was the primary diagnosis by 14 (39.9%) of the 36 physicians and was included in the differential diagnosis by five others (13.9%). Twelve (33.3%) had not considered syphilis but did obtain a routine serological test that eventually led to the correct diagnosis. Five other physicians (13.9%) failed to include syphilis in the diagnosis and did not order serological tests. (JAMA1981;246:250-251)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thirty-four patients with secondary syphilis, seen in a public clinic for sexually transmitted diseases, had been examined previously by 36 community physicians. Secondary syphilis was the primary diagnosis by 14 (39.9%) of the 36 physicians and was included in the differential diagnosis by five others (13.9%). Twelve (33.3%) had not considered syphilis but did obtain a routine serological test that eventually led to the correct diagnosis. Five other physicians (13.9%) failed to include syphilis in the diagnosis and did not order serological tests. (JAMA1981;246:250-251)

Key concepts: Medicine, Syphilis, Secondary syphilis, Serology, Treponematosis, Differential diagnosis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Early syphilis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Physician recognition of the signs and symptoms of secondary syphilis — Research Paper | ScholarLens