2018The Blackwell Encyclopedia of SociologyRequires access

Institutional Isomorphism

Gwilym Croucher, Peter Woelert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The concept of institutional isomorphism has made an enduring contribution to sociological theories of organizations, elucidating distinctive ways in which institutional forces such as commonly shared norms and ideas shape organizations. Its core idea is that organizations' concerns for legitimacy constitute a major source of convergence and conformity in organizational forms and practices. Three major drivers of such convergence are identified: external pressure exerted by powerful organizations on dependent organizations to adopt specific forms and practices; conditions of uncertainty compelling organizations to emulate fellow organizations that are perceived to be more legitimate; and increasing professionalization within a sector or field. Institutional isomorphism has been applied to the study of a wide variety of organizations including government agencies, corporations, schools and universities, and nonprofit organizations. Institutional isomorphism's emphasis on convergence and conformity is seen to be limiting when it comes to accounting for more proactive and strategic kinds of organizational response to environmental conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The concept of institutional isomorphism has made an enduring contribution to sociological theories of organizations, elucidating distinctive ways in which institutional forces such as commonly shared norms and ideas shape organizations. Its core idea is that organizations' concerns for legitimacy constitute a major source of convergence and conformity in organizational forms and practices. Three major drivers of such convergence are identified: external pressure exerted by powerful organizations on dependent organizations to adopt specific forms and practices; conditions of uncertainty compelling organizations to emulate fellow organizations that are perceived to be more legitimate; and increasing professionalization within a sector or field. Institutional isomorphism has been applied to the study of a wide variety of organizations including government agencies, corporations, schools and universities, and nonprofit organizations. Institutional isomorphism's emphasis on convergence and conformity is seen to be limiting when it comes to accounting for more proactive and strategic kinds of organizational response to environmental conditions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The concept of institutional isomorphism has made an enduring contribution to sociological theories of organizations, elucidating distinctive ways in which institutional forces such as commonly shared norms and ideas shape organizations. Its core idea is that organizations' concerns for legitimacy constitute a major source of convergence and conformity in organizational forms and practices. Three major drivers of such convergence are identified: external pressure exerted by powerful organizations on dependent organizations to adopt specific forms and practices; conditions of uncertainty compelling organizations to emulate fellow organizations that are perceived to be more legitimate; and increasing professionalization within a sector or field. Institutional isomorphism has been applied to the study of a wide variety of organizations including government agencies, corporations, schools and universities, and nonprofit organizations. Institutional isomorphism's emphasis on convergence and conformity is seen to be limiting when it comes to accounting for more proactive and strategic kinds of organizational response to environmental conditions.

Key concepts: Isomorphism (crystallography), Organizational field, Conformity, Legitimacy, Institutional theory, Variety (cybernetics), Convergence (economics), Professionalization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Institutional Isomorphism — Research Paper | ScholarLens