2008Journal of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyRequires access

Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor

Michel Zitt, Henry Small

Open publisher page 179 citations

Abstract

Abstract A new approach to the field normalization of the classical journal impact factor is introduced. This approach, called the audience factor, takes into consideration the citing propensity of journals for a given cited journal, specifically, the mean number of references of each citing journal, and fractionally weights the citations from those citing journals. Hence, the audience factor is a variant of a fractional citation‐counting scheme, but computed on the citing journal rather than the citing article or disciplinary level, and, in contrast to other cited‐side normalization strategies, is focused on the behavior of the citing entities. A comparison with standard journal impact factors from Thomson Reuters shows a more diverse representation of fields within various quintiles of impact, significant movement in rankings for a number of individual journals, but nevertheless a high overall correlation with standard impact factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A new approach to the field normalization of the classical journal impact factor is introduced. This approach, called the audience factor, takes into consideration the citing propensity of journals for a given cited journal, specifically, the mean number of references of each citing journal, and fractionally weights the citations from those citing journals. Hence, the audience factor is a variant of a fractional citation‐counting scheme, but computed on the citing journal rather than the citing article or disciplinary level, and, in contrast to other cited‐side normalization strategies, is focused on the behavior of the citing entities. A comparison with standard journal impact factors from Thomson Reuters shows a more diverse representation of fields within various quintiles of impact, significant movement in rankings for a number of individual journals, but nevertheless a high overall correlation with standard impact factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 179 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A new approach to the field normalization of the classical journal impact factor is introduced. This approach, called the audience factor, takes into consideration the citing propensity of journals for a given cited journal, specifically, the mean number of references of each citing journal, and fractionally weights the citations from those citing journals. Hence, the audience factor is a variant of a fractional citation‐counting scheme, but computed on the citing journal rather than the citing article or disciplinary level, and, in contrast to other cited‐side normalization strategies, is focused on the behavior of the citing entities. A comparison with standard journal impact factors from Thomson Reuters shows a more diverse representation of fields within various quintiles of impact, significant movement in rankings for a number of individual journals, but nevertheless a high overall correlation with standard impact factors.

Key concepts: Impact factor, Normalization (sociology), Citation, Weighting, Computer science, Citation analysis, Factor (programming language), Field (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor — Research Paper | ScholarLens