2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Bloodstream Infections

Cathy A. Petti, Hafsa Hassan, L. Barth Reller

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The spectrum of microorganisms causing bacteremia and fungemia in immunocompromised hosts has changed over the last decade, owing in large part to widespread use of chemoprophylaxis, differences in immunosuppressive regimens, and significant increases in the use of long-term indwelling devices. This chapter discusses the approach to immunocompromised patients with suspected bacteremia and fungemia, with particular emphasis on culture-independent diagnostic methods. The authors briefly address the predilection of specific microorganisms to cause invasive bloodstream infections among certain immunocompromised populations and discuss individual risk factors associated with the development of bacteremia and fungemia. The culturing of blood from patients with suspected bloodstream infections has remained one of the most important diagnostic tests performed by the microbiology laboratory. Over the last several decades, improvements in blood culture media and continuously monitoring blood culture systems have greatly enhanced the diagnostic value of blood cultures for the detection of bacteremia and candidemia. The sensitivity of blood cultures is excellent for the detection of nonfastidious bacterial pathogens and increases with the volume of blood collected. Laboratorians can continue to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections and to encourage their clinicians to obtain at least two sets of blood cultures by separate venipuncture before starting antimicrobial therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The spectrum of microorganisms causing bacteremia and fungemia in immunocompromised hosts has changed over the last decade, owing in large part to widespread use of chemoprophylaxis, differences in immunosuppressive regimens, and significant increases in the use of long-term indwelling devices. This chapter discusses the approach to immunocompromised patients with suspected bacteremia and fungemia, with particular emphasis on culture-independent diagnostic methods. The authors briefly address the predilection of specific microorganisms to cause invasive bloodstream infections among certain immunocompromised populations and discuss individual risk factors associated with the development of bacteremia and fungemia. The culturing of blood from patients with suspected bloodstream infections has remained one of the most important diagnostic tests performed by the microbiology laboratory. Over the last several decades, improvements in blood culture media and continuously monitoring blood culture systems have greatly enhanced the diagnostic value of blood cultures for the detection of bacteremia and candidemia. The sensitivity of blood cultures is excellent for the detection of nonfastidious bacterial pathogens and increases with the volume of blood collected. Laboratorians can continue to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections and to encourage their clinicians to obtain at least two sets of blood cultures by separate venipuncture before starting antimicrobial therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The spectrum of microorganisms causing bacteremia and fungemia in immunocompromised hosts has changed over the last decade, owing in large part to widespread use of chemoprophylaxis, differences in immunosuppressive regimens, and significant increases in the use of long-term indwelling devices. This chapter discusses the approach to immunocompromised patients with suspected bacteremia and fungemia, with particular emphasis on culture-independent diagnostic methods. The authors briefly address the predilection of specific microorganisms to cause invasive bloodstream infections among certain immunocompromised populations and discuss individual risk factors associated with the development of bacteremia and fungemia. The culturing of blood from patients with suspected bloodstream infections has remained one of the most important diagnostic tests performed by the microbiology laboratory. Over the last several decades, improvements in blood culture media and continuously monitoring blood culture systems have greatly enhanced the diagnostic value of blood cultures for the detection of bacteremia and candidemia. The sensitivity of blood cultures is excellent for the detection of nonfastidious bacterial pathogens and increases with the volume of blood collected. Laboratorians can continue to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections and to encourage their clinicians to obtain at least two sets of blood cultures by separate venipuncture before starting antimicrobial therapy.

Key concepts: Fungemia, Bacteremia, Blood culture, Intensive care medicine, Medicine, Venipuncture, Bloodstream infection, Chemoprophylaxis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bloodstream Infections — Research Paper | ScholarLens