Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Sepsis
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
This case focuses on the use of intensive insulin therapy with sepsis by asking the question: What are the safety and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy compared with conventional therapy and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) compared with Ringer’s lactate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock? This study demonstrated that critically ill patients did not benefit from intensive insulin therapy targeting blood glucose levels of 80–110 mg/dL vs. conventional insulin therapy nor from fluid resuscitation with HES vs. Ringer’s lactate. Neither intensive insulin therapy nor fluid resuscitation with HES is currently recommended in major sepsis guidelines.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This case focuses on the use of intensive insulin therapy with sepsis by asking the question: What are the safety and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy compared with conventional therapy and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) compared with Ringer’s lactate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock? This study demonstrated that critically ill patients did not benefit from intensive insulin therapy targeting blood glucose levels of 80–110 mg/dL vs. conventional insulin therapy nor from fluid resuscitation with HES vs. Ringer’s lactate. Neither intensive insulin therapy nor fluid resuscitation with HES is currently recommended in major sepsis guidelines.
Key concepts: Resuscitation, Hydroxyethyl starch, Sepsis, Insulin, Medicine, Septic shock, Intensive care medicine, Shock (circulatory)