2018Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Sepsis

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This case focuses on the use of intensive insulin therapy with sepsis by asking the question: What are the safety and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy compared with conventional therapy and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) compared with Ringer’s lactate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock? This study demonstrated that critically ill patients did not benefit from intensive insulin therapy targeting blood glucose levels of 80–110 mg/dL vs. conventional insulin therapy nor from fluid resuscitation with HES vs. Ringer’s lactate. Neither intensive insulin therapy nor fluid resuscitation with HES is currently recommended in major sepsis guidelines.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This case focuses on the use of intensive insulin therapy with sepsis by asking the question: What are the safety and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy compared with conventional therapy and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) compared with Ringer’s lactate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock? This study demonstrated that critically ill patients did not benefit from intensive insulin therapy targeting blood glucose levels of 80–110 mg/dL vs. conventional insulin therapy nor from fluid resuscitation with HES vs. Ringer’s lactate. Neither intensive insulin therapy nor fluid resuscitation with HES is currently recommended in major sepsis guidelines.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This case focuses on the use of intensive insulin therapy with sepsis by asking the question: What are the safety and efficacy of intensive insulin therapy compared with conventional therapy and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) compared with Ringer’s lactate in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock? This study demonstrated that critically ill patients did not benefit from intensive insulin therapy targeting blood glucose levels of 80–110 mg/dL vs. conventional insulin therapy nor from fluid resuscitation with HES vs. Ringer’s lactate. Neither intensive insulin therapy nor fluid resuscitation with HES is currently recommended in major sepsis guidelines.

Key concepts: Resuscitation, Hydroxyethyl starch, Sepsis, Insulin, Medicine, Septic shock, Intensive care medicine, Shock (circulatory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Sepsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens