2008Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsRequires access

Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation

Douglas TC Lai, Ying Qin, Jin-Ling Tang

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: The primary objective of our review is to determine whether or not motivational interviewing (MI) promotes smoking cessation. Our review will address the following questions: Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with no intervention? Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with simple advice (routine care)? Is MI cost effective in terms of time, i.e. the interview session time or number of sessions/follow up needed, compared with other therapies? Are people who are induced to quit through MI less likely to relapse than those who stop without intervention or with brief advice? Is intensive MI ( more sessions, longer duration of each session) more effective than single or shorter sessions? Does MI have incremental effects when used with other therapies? Does MI have any significant harmful effects?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: The primary objective of our review is to determine whether or not motivational interviewing (MI) promotes smoking cessation. Our review will address the following questions: Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with no intervention? Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with simple advice (routine care)? Is MI cost effective in terms of time, i.e. the interview session time or number of sessions/follow up needed, compared with other therapies? Are people who are induced to quit through MI less likely to relapse than those who stop without intervention or with brief advice? Is intensive MI ( more sessions, longer duration of each session) more effective than single or shorter sessions? Does MI have incremental effects when used with other therapies? Does MI have any significant harmful effects?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: The primary objective of our review is to determine whether or not motivational interviewing (MI) promotes smoking cessation. Our review will address the following questions: Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with no intervention? Is MI effective for smoking cessation compared with simple advice (routine care)? Is MI cost effective in terms of time, i.e. the interview session time or number of sessions/follow up needed, compared with other therapies? Are people who are induced to quit through MI less likely to relapse than those who stop without intervention or with brief advice? Is intensive MI ( more sessions, longer duration of each session) more effective than single or shorter sessions? Does MI have incremental effects when used with other therapies? Does MI have any significant harmful effects?

Key concepts: Motivational interviewing, Smoking cessation, Medicine, Intervention (counseling), Session (web analytics), Protocol (science), Brief intervention, Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation — Research Paper | ScholarLens