2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

AU ‐C 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit

Joanne M. Flood

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

While AU-C 450 contains guidance on how to use materiality when evaluating the effect of identified misstatements, AU-C 320 offers auditors guidance in using materiality when planning and performing the audit. Audit risk is the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated and the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion. In considering audit risk at the overall financial statement level, the auditor should consider risks of material misstatement that relate pervasively to the financial statements taken as a whole and often potentially relate to many assertions. Determining materiality in the planning phase is a matter of professional judgment. The auditor should determine a materiality level for the financial statements taken as a whole when establishing the overall audit strategy. During the audit, the auditor may become aware of information that indicates that a lower level of materiality is more appropriate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While AU-C 450 contains guidance on how to use materiality when evaluating the effect of identified misstatements, AU-C 320 offers auditors guidance in using materiality when planning and performing the audit. Audit risk is the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated and the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion. In considering audit risk at the overall financial statement level, the auditor should consider risks of material misstatement that relate pervasively to the financial statements taken as a whole and often potentially relate to many assertions. Determining materiality in the planning phase is a matter of professional judgment. The auditor should determine a materiality level for the financial statements taken as a whole when establishing the overall audit strategy. During the audit, the auditor may become aware of information that indicates that a lower level of materiality is more appropriate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While AU-C 450 contains guidance on how to use materiality when evaluating the effect of identified misstatements, AU-C 320 offers auditors guidance in using materiality when planning and performing the audit. Audit risk is the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated and the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion. In considering audit risk at the overall financial statement level, the auditor should consider risks of material misstatement that relate pervasively to the financial statements taken as a whole and often potentially relate to many assertions. Determining materiality in the planning phase is a matter of professional judgment. The auditor should determine a materiality level for the financial statements taken as a whole when establishing the overall audit strategy. During the audit, the auditor may become aware of information that indicates that a lower level of materiality is more appropriate.

Key concepts: Materiality (auditing), Audit, Audit risk, Financial statement, Accounting, Audit evidence, Business, Auditor's report

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AU ‐C 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit — Research Paper | ScholarLens