2017Unpublished venueOpen access

Changing Antimalarial Drug Sensitivities in Uganda

Stephanie Rasmussen

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment and prevention of malaria in Uganda. However, resistance to both components of this regimen has emerged in Southeast Asia. The efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line regimen to treat malaria in Uganda, has also been excellent, but continued pressure may select for parasites with decreased sensitivity to lumefantrine. To gain insight into current drug sensitivity patterns, ex vivo sensitivities were assessed and genotypes previously associated with altered drug sensitivity were characterized for 58 isolates collected in Tororo, Uganda from subjects presenting in 2016 with malaria from the community or as part of a clinical trial comparing DP chemoprevention regimens. Compared to community isolates, those from trial subjects had lower sensitivities to the aminoquinolines chloroquine, monodesethyl amodiaquine, and piperaquine, and greater sensitivities to lumefantrine and mefloquine, consistent with DP selection pressure. Compared to results for isolates from 2010-13, sensitivities of 2016 community isolates to chloroquine, amodiaquine, and piperaquine improved (geometric mean IC50s 248, 76.9, and 19.1 nM in 2010-13 and 33.4, 14.9, and 7.5 nM in 2016, respectively, P50 3.0 nM in 2010-13 and 5.4 nM in 2016, P50 1.4 nM). These changes were accompanied by decreased prevalence of transporter mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance and low prevalence of polymorphisms recently associated with resistance to artemisinins or piperaquine. Antimalarial drug sensitivities are changing in Uganda, but novel genotypes associated with DP treatment failure in Asia are not prevalent.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment and prevention of malaria in Uganda. However, resistance to both components of this regimen has emerged in Southeast Asia. The efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line regimen to treat malaria in Uganda, has also been excellent, but continued pressure may select for parasites with decreased sensitivity to lumefantrine. To gain insight into current drug sensitivity patterns, ex vivo sensitivities were assessed and genotypes previously associated with altered drug sensitivity were characterized for 58 isolates collected in Tororo, Uganda from subjects presenting in 2016 with malaria from the community or as part of a clinical trial comparing DP chemoprevention regimens. Compared to community isolates, those from trial subjects had lower sensitivities to the aminoquinolines chloroquine, monodesethyl amodiaquine, and piperaquine, and greater sensitivities to lumefantrine and mefloquine, consistent with DP selection pressure. Compared to results for isolates from 2010-13, sensitivities of 2016 community isolates to chloroquine, amodiaquine, and piperaquine improved (geometric mean IC50s 248, 76.9, and 19.1 nM in 2010-13 and 33.4, 14.9, and 7.5 nM in 2016, respectively, P50 3.0 nM in 2010-13 and 5.4 nM in 2016, P50 1.4 nM). These changes were accompanied by decreased prevalence of transporter mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance and low prevalence of polymorphisms recently associated with resistance to artemisinins or piperaquine. Antimalarial drug sensitivities are changing in Uganda, but novel genotypes associated with DP treatment failure in Asia are not prevalent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment and prevention of malaria in Uganda. However, resistance to both components of this regimen has emerged in Southeast Asia. The efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line regimen to treat malaria in Uganda, has also been excellent, but continued pressure may select for parasites with decreased sensitivity to lumefantrine. To gain insight into current drug sensitivity patterns, ex vivo sensitivities were assessed and genotypes previously associated with altered drug sensitivity were characterized for 58 isolates collected in Tororo, Uganda from subjects presenting in 2016 with malaria from the community or as part of a clinical trial comparing DP chemoprevention regimens. Compared to community isolates, those from trial subjects had lower sensitivities to the aminoquinolines chloroquine, monodesethyl amodiaquine, and piperaquine, and greater sensitivities to lumefantrine and mefloquine, consistent with DP selection pressure. Compared to results for isolates from 2010-13, sensitivities of 2016 community isolates to chloroquine, amodiaquine, and piperaquine improved (geometric mean IC50s 248, 76.9, and 19.1 nM in 2010-13 and 33.4, 14.9, and 7.5 nM in 2016, respectively, P50 3.0 nM in 2010-13 and 5.4 nM in 2016, P50 1.4 nM). These changes were accompanied by decreased prevalence of transporter mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance and low prevalence of polymorphisms recently associated with resistance to artemisinins or piperaquine. Antimalarial drug sensitivities are changing in Uganda, but novel genotypes associated with DP treatment failure in Asia are not prevalent.

Key concepts: Piperaquine, Lumefantrine, Mefloquine, Artemether/lumefantrine, Malaria, Artemisinin, Medicine, Amodiaquine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Changing Antimalarial Drug Sensitivities in Uganda — Research Paper | ScholarLens