2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Hip Resurfacing

Gareth Chan, Sharad Goyal, MICHAEL S. MOSS

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip replacement (THR) in younger, more active patients. The benefit of hip resurfacing is that the retention of a near-native femoral head size allows for greater range of motion and thus restoration of physiological function. Resurfacing involves the least overall removal of bone from the acetabulum and femoral head/neck, when compared to THR, due to the preservation of the femoral neck and portion of the femoral head. The use of larger femoral head sizes in resurfacing compared with a THR reduces the risk of dislocation due to the increased range arc of motion the hip joint enjoys, and thus increasing the jump distance before the hip dislocates. The overall survival of all hip resurfacings performed for osteoarthritis is approximately 13% at 15 years, with significantly higher rates of revision when performed for avascular necrosis or developmental dysplasia. In the majority of cases, a resurfacing is revised to a total hip replacement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip replacement (THR) in younger, more active patients. The benefit of hip resurfacing is that the retention of a near-native femoral head size allows for greater range of motion and thus restoration of physiological function. Resurfacing involves the least overall removal of bone from the acetabulum and femoral head/neck, when compared to THR, due to the preservation of the femoral neck and portion of the femoral head. The use of larger femoral head sizes in resurfacing compared with a THR reduces the risk of dislocation due to the increased range arc of motion the hip joint enjoys, and thus increasing the jump distance before the hip dislocates. The overall survival of all hip resurfacings performed for osteoarthritis is approximately 13% at 15 years, with significantly higher rates of revision when performed for avascular necrosis or developmental dysplasia. In the majority of cases, a resurfacing is revised to a total hip replacement.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip replacement (THR) in younger, more active patients. The benefit of hip resurfacing is that the retention of a near-native femoral head size allows for greater range of motion and thus restoration of physiological function. Resurfacing involves the least overall removal of bone from the acetabulum and femoral head/neck, when compared to THR, due to the preservation of the femoral neck and portion of the femoral head. The use of larger femoral head sizes in resurfacing compared with a THR reduces the risk of dislocation due to the increased range arc of motion the hip joint enjoys, and thus increasing the jump distance before the hip dislocates. The overall survival of all hip resurfacings performed for osteoarthritis is approximately 13% at 15 years, with significantly higher rates of revision when performed for avascular necrosis or developmental dysplasia. In the majority of cases, a resurfacing is revised to a total hip replacement.

Key concepts: Hip resurfacing, Medicine, Surgery, Arthroplasty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hip Resurfacing — Research Paper | ScholarLens